What the **** are you even talking about?
The rest of that comment was just as absurd as the first sentence.
What the **** are you even talking about?
I don't even know what's going on anymore. I think we have entered the twilight zone.
Everybody jump to conclusions!
And I know not to trust weather forecasts this far out, but looking like a rainy week+ in the area. Just hoping it's sunny on Sunday, as I'm about 50% sure that I'll be going to the Sox/Tigers game for the cheap seats and to enjoy a long weekend.
Anyway, re: Baez. His .732 OPS would put him in the top 10 for second basemen if he had enough at bats to qualify. If this is the struggling part of his development then the Cubs could be in for something special with him.
Sheffield had the exact same swing and was good forever unless you attribute that to flax seed oil.
He didn't have the exact same swing unless both wiggling the bat means so.
He didn't have the exact same swing unless both wiggling the bat means so.
And notice you don't have 10 people telling me I'm wrong which would have happened if I was.
You guys are starting down the long road to becoming good every season. We're walking up to the front door.
Well and that's the rub with the Cubs eh? Even when they've been at "the front door", they've found some way (or several ways) to fail.
The Sox have had at least one shining moment, this century even. They grew/acquired talent and rolled through the season, fought off a late slump/Cleveland charge and then steamrolled through the playoffs losing one game.
With the Cubs and their fans it's always about next season or the next two or the next five. Maybe one of these decades it will actually happen.