OOT Scoreboard 2023-24 playoffs

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
42,879
12,808
Miami
That’s a real bad call. Not only does the cross check send the defender into the goalie in the blue, but it gives Bennett the space to shoot the puck. That is classic interference.
 

Dialamo

Fire Rogalski Hire Pepe
Jul 7, 2007
10,238
6,505
Montreal, QC, Canada
I'm amazed the crowd isn't more incensed.
They aren't drunk enough yet.

jnLI7uO.png
 

guitarguyvic

Registered User
Mar 31, 2010
8,887
7,132
Is it in the rule book that you can’t push an opposing player into the goalie? It sounds like it should be but is it?
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
14,040
17,972
That Bennett goal is going to up a can of worms, you just admitted that you can push guys into goalies if the refs are blind and score. Chances are Swayman isn't making that save regardless but Coyle is gonna sweep the puck out of the crease at the WORST.
 

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
42,879
12,808
Miami
Is it in the rule book that you can’t push an opposing player into the goalie? It sounds like it should be but is it?
It is:

IMG_2022.png


I think this was a it of stubborness in the official because not only is it an offensive player making contact with a player into the goalie, but it was push off by to allow him to play the puck. It would have been an interference penalty, but I don’t think they wanted to admit that missed call. Bennett basically commits offensive pass interference on the play.
 

guitarguyvic

Registered User
Mar 31, 2010
8,887
7,132
It is:

View attachment 869479

I think this was a it of stubborness in the official because not only is it an offensive player making contact with a player into the goalie, but it was push off by to allow him to play the puck. It would have been an interference penalty, but I don’t think they wanted to admit that missed call. Bennett basically commits offensive pass interference on the play.
Ok that makes sense but is that under “goalie interference” or just regular interference? I think the issue is that the former is reviewable but not the latter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Devilsgrl35

Registered User
Feb 15, 2009
6,840
5,297
New York
That Bennett goal is going to up a can of worms, you just admitted that you can push guys into goalies if the refs are blind and score. Chances are Swayman isn't making that save regardless but Coyle is gonna sweep the puck out of the crease at the WORST.
This is exactly it. Coyle would've held Bennett's ground and he doesn't even get the shot off.
 

TheUnseenHand

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
47,845
18,696
That Bennett goal is going to up a can of worms, you just admitted that you can push guys into goalies if the refs are blind and score. Chances are Swayman isn't making that save regardless but Coyle is gonna sweep the puck out of the crease at the WORST.

This is the league getting ready to pull a bait and switch on the Panthers when all of the stuff they are getting away with against the Bs and more is called against the when they play the rags.
 

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,574
13,982
Swayman's never going to be able to get over to cover that side of the net anyway. It's not interference on Bennett - that level of contact is always legal when the puck's around a guy. I think if Swayman were already on that side of the net and something like that happened, it's called off.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad