LemmyUlanov55
4th line grinder
- Apr 3, 2016
- 5,209
- 4,236
Haha, thought exactly the same.."Hey doesnt Korpikoski play there?"
- Jesse Puljajarvi, draft day
Sorry bud. Welcome to Edmonton.
Haha, thought exactly the same.."Hey doesnt Korpikoski play there?"
- Jesse Puljajarvi, draft day
Sorry bud. Welcome to Edmonton.
Pakarinen is 90x the player Korpse is so whatever.
Man wouldnt it be nice to have Gordon on that fourth line winning draws for us...
Why do people have to pretend Gordon was/is a bad player. He did what he always did in Arizona this year, wins faceoffs and keeps goals out of his net. Gordon was a terrific Oiler, overpaid sure but at the end of the day he would have been a UFA and not a buyout.
Fayne and Ference will clear up 6.75 million.
10 years of last place finishes didn't break your spirit but trading Hall did?
Unless there's something else on the way, I don't get why you'd do this.
1 year left, sure he's overpaid, but it's not like cap space is an issue here. He was at least still serviceable, and would have been fine as the 13th forward.
Perhaps Chai's got a deal lined up, and is wanting the roster spot.
The rule outlawing his style of faceoffs certainly hurt his value.
Gregor just made a good point about why this buyout makes no sense. The cap hit is still 500K for this year and 1M for next year. Compare that to 2.5M for one season if they kept him (or even less if they sent him to the minors) and then Korpse is off the books next year. The latter sounds like a much better idea.
Gregor just made a good point about why this buyout makes no sense. The cap hit is still 500K for this year and 1M for next year. Compare that to 2.5M for one season if they kept him (or even less if they sent him to the minors) and then Korpse is off the books next year. The latter sounds like a much better idea.
Roster spot. That's all I've got.
Me too, but that still doesn't justify the move. They can't be in such a dire situation that keeping Korpse for one more year (again, it could even be in the minors for a lower cap hit) hurts them.
Puzzled by this move. I thought Korpse was our best bottom 6 forward last season. He even spent time on the top 6.
This is the same organization that traded their best player yesterday. Seems like they have trouble evaluating their players.
Gordon for Korpse was a bad trade. I said so at the time. So this "good move" fixes the bad one of a year ago.
Why did we ever obtain him? Still wondering about that one.
Genius of Chia I guess..
I wonder what I said about this useless player all along.
I have no idea what this team is doing anymore. I don't even know why we traded for Korpikoski in the first place, may as well just have kept Gordon and let his contract expire, we'd have a full extra 3 million of cap room.
Why did we ever obtain him? Still wondering about that one.
Genius of Chia I guess..
I wonder what I said about this useless player all along.
I don't think it had anything to do with his love for Korpse. I think he just didn't think Gordon's body could continue to play through all of those tough minutes and it was a fair point to worry about.
So trade for a player that has looked dead for the last 2 seasons then. I watched a lot of Yotes hockey (because of Gagner) Korpse was the worst player on that club the year Chia signed him. Chia could deal for any bottomsix player, picks korpse
And signed Letestu to a full value deal to replace Gordon.