So, every single player the team ever adds should be primarily offensive, at least until the offense is taken care of? You can't, you know, maybe look at adding offense and preserving defense at the same time?
The reason you guys are all going mental here is that you just want to see a bunch of kids. Then, when the roster melts down and the team tanks, well, that's actually what you really wanted all along.
The organization wants to make the playoffs, and Holland wants to make the playoffs, so you (possibly) sign Helm for 2 or 3 years at ~2.75 a season because he's a better bottom 6 winger than Jurco is.
The team flat out doesn't want what you want, and they haven't for 3+ years now. It's not at all an inscrutable decision-making process if someone can set aside their own value system and look at the situation through someone elses.
5 years @ 3.85M for Helm.
That is a bad contract. Like, really bad. I was thinking 3 at ~2.75. That's really bad. I mean, really bad. Bad bad bad.
Would you guys do Wideman @ 50%, 3rd round pick for Smith?
That is a bad contract. Like, really bad. I was thinking 3 at ~2.75. That's really bad. I mean, really bad. Bad bad bad.
Refreshing, and I agree with you.
Would you guys do Wideman @ 50%, 3rd round pick for Smith?