Lunatik
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2012
- 56,251
- 8,384
About your custom user title, would PWjunior Jr, be PW III?At least it's not that late for you. It's almost 1 ******* AM here.
About your custom user title, would PWjunior Jr, be PW III?At least it's not that late for you. It's almost 1 ******* AM here.
I'm not entirely confident Hartley is the coach of the future for us at this point. What worked for us last year isn't working this year... at all. I could actually see Carlyle doing some good here.
About your custom user title, would PWjunior Jr, be PW III?
Honestly maybe we should hire Troy G Ward. He seemed to be pretty cognizant of the fact that Hartley's system does not work.
Terrible possession 5 on 5, terrible pk (gotta be last after tonight), terrible powerplay. The coaching staff has got to go.
Definitely. Can't win a faceoff, fire coaching staff. That's pretty sound logic.
Terrible possession 5 on 5, terrible pk (gotta be last after tonight), terrible powerplay. The coaching staff has got to go.
I'm pretty torn on what to do about the coaches, honestly. Mostly Hartley.
While I agree with some of the people who had said that the last thing a rebuilding team needs is a revolving door of coaches (a la Edmonton), it's pretty clear that Hartley (at least some of the time) has no ****ing idea what he's doing with our roster. Just last night, even: what in the world was Wideman doing out there in the last 90 seconds? I thought we were all about earning our roster spots. But I guess it's totally fine that Wideman took a bad penalty that led to the goal that literally lost us the game and then he's out there in crunch time. At this point I would put almost anyone else out there ahead of Wideman in the final minute, (even Engelland, who doesn't score, but at least he knows what the **** he's doing.)
I'm also not a fan of how Hartley manages the goalies, which is more a topic for a different thread, but it lends itself to this conversation as well.
I'm not saying Hartley should be fired, but something clearly isn't working.
Puck possession starts with winning faceoffs. If your not winning them, any system will look bad.
Definitely. Can't win a faceoff, fire coaching staff. That's pretty sound logic.
You believe all of those are because of face off percent? Really?
The relationship between those stats and face off percents is weak at best.
On a PP lose faceoff run after puck. On a PK lose faceoff, run after puck. Goalie pulled on a 6-5? Lose faceoff run after puck. Need I say more?
>implying he'll actually hit the netWhy was Wideman out there? Big RH shot to increase odds of a one-timer. He and Hamilton should have been alternating the final 3 minutes or so for this reason alone.
It's the running around part that's concerning, because as stated above, bad faceoff teams have no issues getting possesion back.
>implying he'll actually hit the net
The team is younger and on the smaller side. They need to get physically stronger IMO.
Our statistically worst possession forwards are Colborne, Jones, Stajan, and Monahan. All 6'2 / ~200lbs or greater.
Our statistically best forwards are Backlund, Raymond, and Bennett. All ~6'0 / 185lbs. Last year you could add Byron to that mix at 5'6" / 175lbs