Well, you're comparing Case Keenum to some of the best QBs to ever play football...I dunno, the upper tier QBs can adjust their throws/timing to deal with bad conditions. Brady, Manning (Eli when he was younger, Payton wasn't good outside), Rothensburger, and Rodgers have all done very well in the cold (for current QBs). That is a lot of rings in those combined QBs, and every one of them is a HoF lock.
Even 2nd tier guys like Wilson and Dalton play well outside in bad conditions. Kapernick had the game of his life (used his legs a lot) in a Playoff game in similar conditions a couple of years ago.
Neither Keenum (could end up being a Dilfer type of SB winning QB) nor Hundley (not a good QB at all) could make those deep throws that would have broken the game open today.
I don't mind the Packers getting shutout today; they left at least a FG (maybe 2) off the board trying to go for a win.
However, a source told ESPN that Rodgers wasn’t going to be medically cleared to play against the Vikings.
I think that rule is stupid. It was very clear that Rodgers wasn't 100% against the Panthers.
Yes, but as I said in my post, not being cleared against the Vikings =/= new injury.I think that rule is stupid. It was very clear that Rodgers wasn't 100% against the Panthers.
Link:
Dude was hit 12 times and sacked three times against Carolina.
You can't aggravate a broken bone.I don't know if I buy the bonuses argument. Games played bonuses usually require being on the field, not just on the roster. He would have just been left off the active roster without IR anyways. Circumventing the roster limit is a quality argument.
If the Packers had won last week, Rodgers would probably have played last night. If the Vikings played the same way (I think MN would have played better if Rodgers played) I think he'd have easily have beaten them.
Maybe he did aggravate his shoulder again. It's the excuse GB will use. The league could look into it if they wanted too. The medical records (x-rays and such) don't lie.
So I suppose it's not at all possible that Rodgers injured himself against Carolina, especially considering he took some big hits. I believe his last play of the game he took a huge hit from his blindside right before Allison fumbled the ball.Rule is there for a reason. If Rodgers wasn't healthy, then he shouldn't have come off of IR, if he was healthy enough to come off IR he shouldn't be able to go back on it when it is convenient to the team to be able to circumvent the roster limit (and save money on any bonuses for games played and such). If the Packers had won, Rodgers would have stayed off IR - he didn't go back on just because he's injured, he went back because they lost.
Rodgers obviously isn't going to be released, but the Packers should know the rules and be smart enough to just bench Rodgers instead of going on IR. They'll say he re-aggrevated the injury or something and avoid punishment, but it's not like this rule was some secret that ambushed the Packers.
It doesn't mean there wasn't a new injury either.Yes, but as I said in my post, not being cleared against the Vikings =/= new injury.
You can't aggravate a broken bone.
The fact that they waited until after the MNF game, to confirm that they were out of the playoffs, makes it pretty blatant that there was no new injury.So I suppose it's not at all possible that Rodgers injured himself against Carolina, especially considering he took some big hits. I believe his last play of the game he took a huge hit from his blindside right before Allison fumbled the ball.
This is 100% on the Packers front office for not being smart enough to come up with any of the excuses you're talking about.So I suppose it's not at all possible that Rodgers injured himself against Carolina, especially considering he took some big hits. I believe his last play of the game he took a huge hit from his blindside right before Allison fumbled the ball.
I do think there should be exceptions to the rule for positions that are not easily "covered" for. For example, let's say the Packers don't place Rodgers on IR and instead sit him on the bench, meaning Joe Callahan isn't signed back to be Hundley's backup. What happens if Hundley gets injured? Then Green Bay is forced to put in either a player that shouldn't be quarterback or a less than 100% superstar and risk another injury at the hands of the defense that injured him to begin with.
It doesn't mean there wasn't a new injury either.
It's the pins he got, if they slipped/moved that's how you can re-aggravate it. Or it could have cracked the bone more.
Yup, he had some "soreness". They'll probably come out and say he has another one somewhere even if it's 100% false.The fact that they waited until after the MNF game, to confirm that they were out of the playoffs, makes it pretty blatant that there was no new injury.
Philadelphia secures the 1 seed, but they struggled with Oakland tonight.
I don't even think they'll make it out of the divisional round. From a Vikings perspective, I would not be worried at all going to Philly for the NFCCG.
Philadelphia secures the 1 seed, but they struggled with Oakland tonight.
I don't even think they'll make it out of the divisional round. From a Vikings perspective, I would not be worried at all going to Philly for the NFCCG.
I'm watching the Navy bowl game right now. 11 mins left in the game and their stats line is 406 rushing yards, -5 passing yards (0-1 in pass attempts).
For the season their leading receiver has 14 catches for 381 yards. A combined 98 pass attempts, 42 catches, 1005 yds, 10 TDs, and 10 INTs for the season. Just odd stat line for the current college football game.