JKP
Registered User
Who gives a **** what anyone thinks as long as we keep winning. Rome wasn't built in a day and it will take more than 20 games to erase the stench of 20 yrs.
So true. I can't stand hearing pundits talk about the Islanders, McLean hasn't seen one game. Buccigross/Burnside haven't seen a game. Listening to them just proves it.I'd rather the media not talk about the Islanders anyway. More often than not, they know as much as the average HFBoards poster.
The Hockey News has the Isles at the top of their power rankings and that was before last night's game. So it's not all bad.
There are a few around the media who have a problem with us and that's fine. The guys are playing with a chip on their shoulder and it seems to just make them stronger.
Hockey Central basically covers the Canadian teams first. I think that the only game last night covered with two American based teams before our game was Philadelphia- Detroit.
On the flip side Kevin Weekes from NHL Tonight has really been praising us the last couple of weeks.
I was thinking something similar this past week when NBC had Buffalo vs San Jose on television, not the first and probably not the last Buffalo game on this year.
The Islanders have a first rate star in Tavares and play exciting hockey but never get on a national broadcast. I understand that certain teams are more marketable, but it doesn't make any sense for the league and its partners to marginalize the Islanders.
Unfortunately it will probably take a Conference Final appearance to change the narrative....but the good thing is that that isn't out of reach.
NY Times said:Buffalo was the highest-rated market in the regular season for NBC and NBCSN’s national games and, with Sabres games, generated the second-highest local cable rating in the N.H.L. (Pittsburgh had the highest.)
He's watched them, that's why.
He's watched them, that's why.
I was thinking something similar this past week when NBC had Buffalo vs San Jose on television, not the first and probably not the last Buffalo game on this year.
The Islanders have a first rate star in Tavares and play exciting hockey but never get on a national broadcast. I understand that certain teams are more marketable, but it doesn't make any sense for the league and its partners to marginalize the Islanders.
Unfortunately it will probably take a Conference Final appearance to change the narrative....but the good thing is that that isn't out of reach.
I think it is very difficult to gauge the Isles without actually watching them for 60 min. For the uninitiated, stats and highlights basically tell you the JT and Okposo are good (they already knew that), who the hell is this Brock kid(?), and Leddy, Boychuk and Halak really did shore up the defense. But, none of the new vets are superstars and they could easily come down to earth.
Watching the games tell you a very different story. Waves and waves of offense put even good defenses on their heels. The forecheck is unrelenting. And when that isn't enough, they still hit. For 60 minutes. Are they a perfect team? Not even close. The kids have a lot to learn still. But they're fast and the vets are smart.
Nobody started to notice until they beat the Pens twice. That's the way things work. That was only 5 days ago. The will get more attention from everyone very soon. Unfortunately, that also means scout teams. The Isles won't see backup goalies anymore and defenses will figure some things out. Lets see if Capuano can also adjust. That part makes me nervous.
I agree but these guys are paid to offer their opinions, they should watch some games.
It's just funny that we added two top 4 dmen, a number one goalie, a top 6 forward and a top 9 forward and for every single player we heard people downplay the individual. It's just because they are going to the Islanders.
Halak? Can't stay healthy, only played well because of the Blues system.
Boychuk? Another hidden gem because of the Bruins system, isn't flanked by Z and Rask in net
Leddy? Only good because Hawks are so deep.
Grabovski? Overpaid, hasn't been good in a while, 3rd team in as many years
Kulemin? Overpaid, no offense
Always excuses for why they won't be good here.
That's the typical media for hockey. No attention is paid to the change in the roster, no one wanted to give credit because of past team performances, which is stupid, because this is a good and different team.
Why are people waiting for the Isles to fall back to earth? How stupid is that!? Fall back to last years standards when we didn't have the depth, when the youngins were learning and not contributing daily, when we didn't have the extra quality on the blue line, when we didn't have a number one in Halak?
Not saying we will win 16 out of the next 22 too, but stop saying crap like fall back down, or luck.
I got no time for that.
Who gives a **** what anyone thinks as long as we keep winning. Rome wasn't built in a day and it will take more than 20 games to erase the stench of 20 yrs.
No offense but until this team does something in the post season nobody outside of us are going to give a damn.
To them this is just a nice story and surprising but they're still the islanders anything that can go wrong in the last 20 years usually has. It's going to take more than a great start to change the perception of this franchise in the national eyes.
I think it is very difficult to gauge the Isles without actually watching them for 60 min. For the uninitiated, stats and highlights basically tell you the JT and Okposo are good (they already knew that), who the hell is this Brock kid(?), and Leddy, Boychuk and Halak really did shore up the defense. But, none of the new vets are superstars and they could easily come down to earth.
Watching the games tell you a very different story. Waves and waves of offense put even good defenses on their heels. The forecheck is unrelenting. And when that isn't enough, they still hit. For 60 minutes. Are they a perfect team? Not even close. The kids have a lot to learn still. But they're fast and the vets are smart.
Nobody started to notice until they beat the Pens twice. That's the way things work. That was only 5 days ago. The will get more attention from everyone very soon. Unfortunately, that also means scout teams. The Isles won't see backup goalies anymore and defenses will figure some things out. Lets see if Capuano can also adjust. That part makes me nervous.
ESPN had a column up yesterday touting brock nelson as something like "the breakout player no one's heard of." i've seen a lot of it, and i find it kind of ridiculous — he was a first rounder! he wasn't a household name, but it's not like he came out of nowhere.
As I watched the NHL Network last night at 11pm, I noticed that the Islanders/Capitals game was not mentioned at all until about 1/3rd of the way through the show and no highlights were shown in the shows opener.
This was the "Hockey Central" show with Daren Millard, Scott Morrison and Doug Maclean.
As the 2nd round of commercials came on, and still no mention of the Islanders even playing a game, I turned to my son and said, "I guess the Islanders didn't play tonight."
"Maybe the game was a dream, dad," replied my 14 year old.
Finally when the game was mentioned, they pick up the action with Ovechkin's first goal which tied the game. They spent time discussing the Great 8. Then they showed Hamonic's goal, mentioning how he is becoming a real NHL defenseman. They followed that up showing Ovechkin's goal to tie it at 2, and how terrible the Islanders coverage was (and it was). Then they showed the game winner in OT. They did not show the opening goal by Lee.
There was opening post highlight discussion about Ovechkin next. All about his game, and how great he is. Then they got around to "and hey, how about those Islanders?" All of the other games featured discussion of the winning team first, followed by discussion of the losing team.
The comments were mostly about some depth the Islanders added and they are currently playing well. Nothing of real significance —*just finding ways to win some games. Earlier in the night, when covering the Flames, the three talking heads commented that the Flames were the "feel good story" of the NHL.
The three talking heads went on to discuss even if the Islanders would make the playoffs although they begrudgingly admitted that the stats are in the favor of the Islanders based on their position at Thanksgiving.
Doug Maclean then roasted Garth Snow for the Moulson/Vanek deal some more — as if we hadn't heard about that, and that the trade was made last week.. "The owner, Wang, Wong, what ever his name is.... Somehow he lets Snow stay on, and he brings in Halak who is playing great right now. Yeah, sure they should make the playoffs but win a round? Who knows. I just dont know... Lets see where we are down the road."
I am not hear to defend Wang, but it's not as if this owner has been here for two days. He's owned the team for over a decade. Like him or hate him, there should be at least the dignity of getting his name right. It is no different then when the Vancouver papers got Matt Moulson's name wrong (calling him Coulson.) It is a level of disrespect that shows the level of class of Maclean and the producers of the show.
Further — this is a continuation of disrespect the New York Islander franchise has experienced since its inception in 1972. The NHL never wanted to award the Islanders franchise, and only did so to prevent the WHA from gaining a foothold in New York.
Overall, the level of disrespect shown to this franchise continues...
• Despite being tied for first place in the Metro division.
• Despite its nearest competition in the Metro division being 10 point behind them
• Despite having the same number of wins as the Habs, putting us with the most wins in the East.
• Despite being 9-1-0 over the last 10 games — the best current run in the NHL over the last 10 games.
• Despite holding a 5 game win streak — the best current streak in the NHL.
If this was the record of the Leafs... the Oilers... The coverage of the franchise would be the lead of every major NHL-based show. (TV or Radio)
I suppose I should be used to it. I witnessed it during the cup wins, and beyond. Is it deserved when Healy or Ferraro — 2 guys many Isles fans loved as players — bang on the team? Sometimes it is, and sometimes it is not. I have not heard either recently chirp anything negative. When it's deserved — I have no issues —*be critical. But get the players, the owners name right. Give them at least the dignity of their names. And when the team is winning, when its performing at the highest levels of the league — they should receive the credit.
Time and patience. We'll get there.
I don't know if patience characterizes 20 years of tortured waiting, but it does look like the roster has finally gotten there.