EXTRAS
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2012
- 8,908
- 5,358
They made lots of good deals. HFboard fans overreacted to Hronek trade and think Canucks did bad lol
Stillman for Bloom
Unsigned Horvat for 1st, Beau, Raty
Kravatsov for 7th and Lockwood
Schenn for 3rd
Lazar for 4th
Just because they overpaid a bit for Hronek and maybe bad timing, doesn't mean Canucks did bad overall. I give them B+ to an A- looking at their trades. Hronek is worth a 1st minimum and that would be a middle pack 1st round pick and 3rd. They did overpay by giving up a 2nd but Hronek is still 25 year old young top 4 RHD which is hard to find. Also Canucks want a quick retool, they never said they would rebuild even when new management took over and said they want to turn it around in 2 years. In a true rebuild, they would have to trade everyone, even Petersson and Hughes because a true rebuild would take 5 to 7 years to complete and by that time Petersson would be 29 and would be competing when he is almost out of his prime. Overall Canucks did really well this deadline day and finally are changing things around instead of staying the same.
I'll agree with schenn and lazar and kravtsov
Horvat was good but then they undid it sending the best piece and another high 2nd away for a pp special who will never take that spot away from Hughes. The canucks are a bottom 10 team simply replacing horvat with hronek won't change that. But adding hronek may cause the canucks to improve in the standings one or two spots over the remainder of the season...worsening their chances at landing. Bedard. I don't like the hronek deal (value wise or direction wise) but if they must do it could they have at least waited until the off season.
They are building the team like they want to make it just good enough to sneak into the playoffs while they should be building it to be a top 5 team in the league for years.