A 4th line of Bourque - Sissons - Watson would be so good.
God, I hate Nystrom and Gaustad.
Very curious to hear how the rest of the lines shake out, but it's exciting to know we have a dominant line.
My preference for the other three:
Wilson-Ribiero-Smith
Salomaki-Fisher-Jarnkrok (shut down line)
Watson-Sissons-Hodgson/Arvy
No way we scratch Goose and Nystrom though.
Why? They do what a 4th line is supposed to do
Why? They do what a 4th line is supposed to do
Not sure I want Ribeiro on the 2nd line anymore. Can't stand him.
At least Fish tries, put him at 2C and Ribs on Jarnkrok's wing on the 3rd line.
Suck? Be poor defensively? Be hilariously overpaid? Be easy to play against for opposition?
I think being overpaid is the biggest thing against them. They do what they're supposed to IMO
Why? They do what a 4th line is supposed to do
-Ribeiro was good yesterday, I liked what I saw.
Good points.-TBH, Forsberg was bad and invisible yesterday. The only time I remember seeing him was the turnover that led to the 2-0 goal. I think he goes to waste in the line with 92 and 18, we can't put all our eggs in the same basket.
-Ribeiro was good yesterday, I liked what I saw.
Right now, I don't get the hate for Wilson. He has been our best forward for few games now. I'd still run with 33-92-18.
Last year 9-63-15 clicked get them together. Put Vesey on that line if he comes here.
Call up Fiala and 3rd Fiala-12-19/Salomaki. We need Fisher to be better.
You all know what I think about the 4th line I'm not going to say it again. Sissons is +7 and 60% at the dot. When is Lavy going to realize all this I hope soon.
Watson and Arvidsson aren't NHL players sent them to MIL.
I just hope we get 57 back as soon as possible.
Thank goodness, Granberg worked.
Why? They do what a 4th line is supposed to do
FF9 needs to be bumped down to the 2nd line at best until he figures out how to control the puck. The kid has turned into a turnover machine that leads to too many good chances on the other end and wastes a shift for our #1 line.
It may just be me but Granberg impressed me.
I liked Granberg too. Played physical, simple game. Hard to play against, excellent in front of the net. Needs to move the puck quicker, though.
Okay, the lines I want to see by the end of the year, or as soon as possible:
Wilson-Joey-Neal
Forsberg-Ribeiro-Fiala/Jarnkrok
Vesey-Fisher-Atkinson/Silfverberg
Bourque-Sissons-Salomaki
Defense set
PK:
Sissons-Bourque
Fisher-Jarnkrok
Webs-Josi
Ek-Granny
PP:
Wilson-Joey-Neal
Vesey-Ribs-Fish
Webs-Josi
FF-Ellis
It may just be me but Granberg impressed me.