Confirmed Trade: [MTL/VAN] Tanner Pearson and 2025 3rd round pick for Casey DeSmith

Vancouver_2010

Canucks and Oilers fan
Jun 21, 2006
6,286
1,282
Given a large enough population there will always be outliers, stop listening to the loud fringe minority.
I was one of those load fringe minority to voice such opinion, but you would understand why we have such concern.
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,155
24,049
Vancouver, BC
He wasn't that good for Pittsbugh but still better than a lot of teams goaltenders. Teams probably weren't willing to give up a 3rd for another goaltender that early. And then have to find a spot for the goaltender he would replace.
The third wasn’t given for DeSmith. It was the price to dump Pearson’s $3 million cap hit.
 

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
6,776
4,802
Dartmouth, NS
I think they gambled that he can return to somewhat decent form to flip at deadline. Definitely was not the case.
That was the notion. Flip Pearson and get an extra asset. He started out okay, but he's cooked. No great loss. They had the space to maximize the pick they got. DeSmith didn't have much value otherwise and Montreal didn't have much bargaining power in what was a 4 goalie logjam at the time.
 

Rpenny

Registered User
Feb 23, 2019
1,826
1,080
In looking at the final tally from this trade. DeSmith won 12 games and tied 6 others while Pearson ended up with 5 goals and 13pts. Even though he is a UFA, Vancouver won this deal
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EveryDay

Riggins

Registered User
Jul 12, 2002
7,857
4,721
Vancouver, BC
In looking at the final tally from this trade. DeSmith won 12 games and tied 6 others while Pearson ended up with 5 goals and 13pts. Even though he is a UFA, Vancouver won this deal

The main asset for Montreal was the pick, they had to carry Pearson's salary to dump DeSmith. Montreal already had three goalies to carry on the roster.

DeSmith gave Vancouver some good starts this year, but they also kicked him to the curb for their third stringer Silovs when Demko went down.

I'm sure both teams are content with this deal.
 

JianYang

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
18,137
16,674
That was the notion. Flip Pearson and get an extra asset. He started out okay, but he's cooked. No great loss. They had the space to maximize the pick they got. DeSmith didn't have much value otherwise and Montreal didn't have much bargaining power in what was a 4 goalie logjam at the time.

That has been the motto with the Habs management. The veterans they take on every year are a reclamation project that they hope to build back up and flip at the deadline.

Monahan turned out to be an absolute coup as they turned him into two first rounders.

The Pearson and dadonov experiments produced nothing, however. Dadonov was a strange case though because he seems to have fit well as a peice on a cup contender. But he didn't look very good in Montreal.... perhaps he was disinterested knowing he would get moved regardless.
 

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
6,776
4,802
Dartmouth, NS
That has been the motto with the Habs management. The veterans they take on every year are a reclamation project that they hope to build back up and flip at the deadline.

Monahan turned out to be an absolute coup as they turned him into two first rounders.

The Pearson and dadonov experiments produced nothing, however. Dadonov was a strange case though because he seems to have fit well as a peice on a cup contender. But he didn't look very good in Montreal.... perhaps he was disinterested knowing he would get moved regardless.
He'd have a good game every 1 in 5, but I think disinterested is putting it mildly. That said, he wasn't so much a reclamation project as he was the contract they had to take back to get rid of Weber's contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDN24 and pth2

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad