Bloomberg
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2014
- 1,869
- 481
Bryon, Mete, Chiarot, Fleury
for
Subban (50% retained), Murray (50%) retained, Maltsev
for
Subban (50% retained), Murray (50%) retained, Maltsev
aaand thread. you know 0, if you think fleury and chiarot are nothing.Seems like a whole lot of nothing for NJ
They do 0 for NJ. No reason to do this trade from an NJ perspective. It benefits us in 0 ways.aaand thread. you know 0, if you think fleury and chiarot are nothing.
and montreal isn't taking subban back and murray can't stay healthy
NJ is rebuilding and has no interest in Chiarot and Byron. Fleury and Mete aren’t really worth giving up Maltsev let alone use two of our 50% retains for.aaand thread. you know 0, if you think fleury and chiarot are nothing.
and montreal isn't taking subban back and murray can't stay healthy
aaand thread. you know 0, if you think fleury and chiarot are nothing.
and montreal isn't taking subban back and murray can't stay healthy
Which is exactly what it is.Seems like a whole lot of nothing for NJ
It needs at least four more players involved, go big or go home.Bryon, Mete, Chiarot, Fleury
for
Subban (50% retained), Murray (50%) retained, Maltsev
Montreal reject this trade..Bryon, Mete, Chiarot, Fleury
for
Subban (50% retained), Murray (50%) retained, Maltsev
Well that's something that's agreed upon, because NJ has no interest in any of those players from the Habs either.I have no interest in any of those players for the Habs.
Seems like a whole lot of nothing for NJ
What does this do for NJ?
The only player here we'd want is Murray and why don't we just do
2nd/3rd + Mete (cap plus young LHD) + Jordan Weal (cap)
For
Murray @ 50%
Pick is conditional depending on how many games Murray plays.
Or something along those lines.