Best vision I've seen in a Leafs jersey, he is Gretzkyesque in his ability to find teammates (if only he could find Waynes competitiveness on the ice). His recent conscious decision to shoot the puck more and hang on less can probably add 10-15 points a year. Very dangerous Penalty Killer that other teams have to plan for that in and of itself, can hamper their approach.
Lacks focus at times on the defensive end and dangles too much at the opposition blue line when the simple play is more prudent than an East/West play. When room on the ice disappears, does he?
That should go in the Dubas complaint thread.The media have been discussing Jason Robertson’s contract and apparently his agent is gonna push to use Marner’s contract as a comparable but they likely won’t be able to because Marner’s contract is viewed as an “outlier”. I remember Bob McKenzie saying the same thing about Marner’s contract a few years ago. Can someone help me out here and explain to me why our GM is giving our players outlier contracts?
He's not. Hockey media is just largely pretty stupid, and either they don't know what they're talking about, or they're pretending to not know what they're talking about to generate views.Can someone help me out here and explain to me why our GM is giving our players outlier contracts?
I respect Bob McKenzie and think he’s pretty reliable.He's not. Hockey media is just largely pretty stupid, and either they don't know what they're talking about, or they're pretending to not know what they're talking about to generate views.
That's nice. I like Bob McKenzie too. That doesn't change the fact that he's wrong sometimes. If he's saying Marner's an outlier, he's factually wrong.I respect Bob McKenzie and think he’s pretty reliable.
Super elitePoints per game in the NHL since October 26th:
1. Mitchell Marner
Maybe your right and Bob McKenzie and those other media members are lying about their inside information. Maybe Robertson will be the first guy to finally get that Mitch Marner money that has eluded all the other superstars in the league.That's nice. I like Bob McKenzie too. That doesn't change the fact that he's wrong sometimes. If he's saying Marner's an outlier, he's factually wrong.
I haven't actually seen Bob McKenzie talk about Robertson's impending contract anywhere, but regardless, let's wait to see what Robertson actually gets. Or better yet, just enjoy the amazing player we have.
He's grown into his contract.
He could have saved himself some grief and got here sooner if he took a little less.
We'll see what happens on his next deal.
Maybe your right and Bob McKenzie and those other media members are lying about their inside information. Maybe Robertson will be the first guy to finally get that Mitch Marner money that has eluded all the other superstars in the league.
"Bob McKenzie and other media members" haven't brought "inside information" that says what you're suggesting, and one doesn't necessarily need to be lying to be wrong anyway.Maybe your right and Bob McKenzie and those other media members are lying about their inside information.
The only "superstars" who were unable to get a Marner-level contract were players that were worse than Marner. If Robertson does get a Marner-level post-ELC contract, he wouldn't be the first. 9 forwards (including 5 wingers) have received even higher value post-ELC contracts than Marner.Maybe Robertson will be the first guy to finally get that Mitch Marner money that has eluded all the other superstars in the league.
Excellent player and excellent draft choice but the contract eliminated our chances to win a cup with this group. We gave him a contract that teams offersheeting him weren't even gonna give him. In fact had he actually had an offer for more, we definitely would have been told of it by him and his agent and that never happened. It's unfortunate... but you have a choice to make, do you want to see your team win a cup or so you want to watch an exciting offensive player? I choose cup.
It isn't gonna happen unless the cap goes up significantly and at that time Tavares' contract will hang us.... we are just in a bad state unfortunately. We needed excess money at the beginning of Tavares contract, not the end.
I don't blame the player, but i dont see a stanley cup team with the way we have managed the cap.
Yeah, both seems to be the obvious answer. It's actually more of a both or neither question than it is a one or the other question, since having Marner increases our cup chances.Both is not an option? Strange.
How has that been going so far? Two upsets in the first round since his contract was signed. No cap space to shore up holes like our goaltending. Easy to say why can't we have both without sticking your neck out and making a prediction because generally people don't go back in time and recover these old threads.Both is not an option? Strange.
Depends on your POV. If producing during the regular season is enough to make you happy, then sure. If you're looking for someone who can produce in the playoffs, then not yet he hasn't.