HellasLEAF
'93 to Infinity
- Sep 14, 2006
- 15,345
- 1,800
his smarts give him such an edge every time out there you don't even think about his size all you think about is if his play will result in a goal.
Mitch looks better on Matthews' wing than Nylander, he needs to stay there.
The biggest thing I have seen that differentiates Marner from any young player I have in recent memory is his passing ability.
He is extremely deceptive.
He looks like he is going somewhere with the puck, and then it goes somewhere else entirely. It makes his passes really hard to predict so hard to defend against, but also hard for his line mates to accept. They often appear surprised the pick ended up going to them.
He's a better player than Nylander. Doesn't make Nylander bad, Mitch just sees the ice so well and is very very smart.
I think we'll need some more icetime from both guys until we can say something like that.
So far neither has definitely shown they should be pairs with Matthews
I just want to explain something to people who still moan about Marner's size.
- Size does not matter in the NHL anymore, ESPECIALLY for a guy like Marner. Why do you say? Let me explain; Gretzky is the best example. You could not hit the guy. He thought the game so well that you just would never catch him flat footed. Marner, like Gaudreau, Johnson, Kane etc. is EXTREMELY elusive. He combines a cerebral off puck movement tendency with a lot of tenacity and ability to get the puck back. There are more "goons" going after Marner and co. in the OHL/AHL (theoretically any small guy playing in the AHL) than there is in the NHL. The NHL is a pure skill game. Hence why D are more considered on their ability to skate and move the puck. Skill and mobility is what has taken over.
- Marner has gotten much quicker. On top of his arguably generational ability to see the ice and make plays and his insane evasiveness and edge work, he now has great acceleration and top end speed. This will make him WAY harder to hit and more threatening on the rush. People being scared that he will be targeted because of his size are wrong. Marner knows his own size, hence why he doesn't get hit. He's too intelligent for that. A guy like Lindros who was massive got destroyed. Where's the size argument for that? Same with Ekblad last season.
- He's too skilled to not make the NHL at this point. He was so good in pre-season that I genuinely thought he was playing at a level above his teammates on his line. Some passes he made, his line mates didn't expect him to get them the puck tape to tape. We are talking about a player with legitimate 100 point a season potential.
Seriously, just stop fretting about his size and just enjoy the magic he will bring, night in and night out. He's the kind of talent that is going to make Rielly score insane amounts of points by virtue of just playing with him.
I'm entitled to my opinion and I stand by it. Marner is much more noticible in the games than Nylander is.
Devils advocate would say that's because you're looking for him more than willie.
They're both going to be great. no reason to take a red vs blue mentality here bud.
You can save a lot of time:
Yzerman was 5'11" (and whiphet thin) when drafted and played in a much goonier/dirtier era.
The biggest thing I have seen that differentiates Marner from any young player I have in recent memory is his passing ability.
He is extremely deceptive.
He looks like he is going somewhere with the puck, and then it goes somewhere else entirely. It makes his passes really hard to predict so hard to defend against, but also hard for his line mates to accept. They often appear surprised the pick ended up going to them.
Mitch looks better on Matthews' wing than Nylander, he needs to stay there.
Mitch needs to get a shoot first mentality. He is too used to playing with Dvo and Tkachuk who are used to his overpassing and "wasting scoring opportunities for a chance at better ones" style of play.
These two think the game at a higher level then anyone else on the roster...match them with a finisher like JVR and look out.
I think we'll need some more icetime from both guys until we can say something like that.
So far neither has definitely shown they should be pairs with Matthews
I find it amazing because in normal circumstances when evaluating a rookies performance in camp to see if he belongs or not, often times you want the player to just blend in and not look out of place and that can be enough to make a team. In Mitch's case he is constantly standing out almost every single time he steps on the ice. He really stepped it up this off season and came into this season on a mission, and thus fat he is doing a damn fine job.
I find it amazing because in normal circumstances when evaluating a rookies performance in camp to see if he belongs or not, often times you want the player to just blend in and not look out of place and that can be enough to make a team. In Mitch's case he is constantly standing out almost every single time he steps on the ice. He really stepped it up this off season and came into this season on a mission, and thus fat he is doing a damn fine job.
I thought he looked a lot better in camp last year than most give him credit for. The biggest difference was simply that last year he was trying to always make the safe play, but the vision, hockey IQ, and skill was evident back then too. He had a positive impact last year, just didn't stand out the way he is this year, now that he's holding on to the puck more.
Anyway, hopefully he keeps this up, and we can finally put to bed all the size garbage, or "OHL is full of little boys" nonsense (saw so much of that in the McDavid vs Eichel debate a year ago too).