Well, we traded Zib because he didn't fit with Ryan. Thus we obtained an older player to invest in chemistry with another older player, and didn't keep the 23 year old.
Did we pull a Vancouver and trade the younger guy(schneider/zib) only cause we couldn't move the older guy(Loungo/Ryan)? But we will still inevitably have to trade the older guy(Ryan/Luongo) anyway cause he still doesn't fit this team?
It's still way too early to tell and I think Brassard is a great acquisition nevertheless. Remains to be seen what happens. I still think Turris will end up with Bobby and Brassard with Stone and that's when the team will be at its best.
No matter what your feelings are on the trade, this is objectively untrue. If you need to lie to get your point across, maybe consider that it's not a point worth making.
Zibanejad had a habit of looking like the second coming of Jesus for 3-4 games then disappearing for the next 20.
I wouldn't get too worried here.
I'll remember to bump this thread at the end of the season when Zibanjad has out produced Brassard
Zibanejad had a habit of looking like the second coming of Jesus for 3-4 games then disappearing for the next 20.
I wouldn't get too worried here.
He's been a PPG center over his last 20+ games.
false
I'll remember to bump this thread at the end of the season when Zibanjad has out produced Brassard
I think it's been well established that this deal was a losing one for the Sens in the long-term no matter what Brassard does for this team. In 3 years we'll have a 32 year old UFA and the Rangers will have a 26 year old Zibanejad just entering his prime. I don't know how anyone could claim that this trade makes us better in the future.
The only redeeming quality this deal had was that Brassard could be significantly better than Zibanejad in the short-term. If he's about the same quality of player, or god forbid even worse than Zibanejad over the next 3 years, this deal is just laughably bad. The kind of deal you look back on and wonder what the hell the GM was thinking.
Of course I have called the trade a disaster since it happened, and I even thought that Brassard would be the better player when I made that claim. If Zibanejad continues to out-perform Brassard, this deal will be one of the worst in Sens history.
You realize that even given the potential situation of Zibanejad outproducing Brassard, we can be a better team with Brassard slotted into Mika's former role? Zibanejad is going to get a ton of pp time, while playing with wingers that have strong play-making abilities at even strength.
It would be a massive black mark on his career if that, combined with him being in the best shape of his life due to a contract year didn't result in him putting up some points. And despite this, we're still probably going to be a more balanced team with Brassard instead.
Mika has had moments of power forwardness. He is good. And he's getting off to a good start. If he keeps it up, man he's gonna get paid this summer. Brassard is $5mil for 3 years. Will Mika get more than that?
At $2 mil, he's a nice bit of cap space usage with potential. When he gets paid as one of the top players ... wouldnt we rather someone cheaper who fits better? Or will he get paid less than Brassard for 5 or 6 years to be in the Rangers core?
I think it's been well established that this deal was a losing one for the Sens in the long-term no matter what Brassard does for this team. In 3 years we'll have a 32 year old UFA and the Rangers will have a 26 year old Zibanejad just entering his prime. I don't know how anyone could claim that this trade makes us better in the future.
The only redeeming quality this deal had was that Brassard could be significantly better than Zibanejad in the short-term. If he's about the same quality of player, or god forbid even worse than Zibanejad over the next 3 years, this deal is just laughably bad. The kind of deal you look back on and wonder what the hell the GM was thinking.
Of course I have called the trade a disaster since it happened, and I even thought that Brassard would be the better player when I made that claim. If Zibanejad continues to out-perform Brassard, this deal will be one of the worst in Sens history.
And Colin White and Logan Brown are 4, and 5 years younger than Zibanejad respectively. Organizational center depth is quite a beautiful thing.
I agree this is definitely a blunder up there with the Red Sox selling Babe Ruth to the Yankees.
The Curse of the Zibby
If the time ever came that Brown and White (the latter of whom could easily play as a RW) forced the organization's hand to trade Zibanejad, at that point we could have dealt him to a different organization in exchange for a top 6 winger or top 4 defenseman.
Instead in 3 years we'll probably let Brassard walk (or maybe even Turris in 2 years) in order to make room for Brown and White, and the organization will continue to have holes in other places in the lineup.
I'm okay with the deal, obviously they are different players who bring a different skill set & IMO Ottawa needed more of what Brassard brings then what Ziggy brings. Brassard is a better puck distributor & both Ryan & Smith need someone to get them the puck in scoring positions & he does that well.
Regardless of which one eventually ends up with more pts isn't going to be as important as to which one makes his line & team better which results in wins. Brassard just seems to make the players around him better which makes our team better & IMO that's a win for Ottawa regardless of how good Zibanejad is for the Rangers. If it's a better fit for both teams then great, it ends up being a good hockey trade for both teams & both teams win.