Fozz said:
Please answer this (since you see him play a lot): How good would Schremp be if he wasn't playing with Perry & Hunter? Who's feeding off of who on this line? Stats aren't everything but why is it that those 2 have more points?
If anybody is feeding off anybody its Hunter off of Perry and/or Schremp. I'm telling you i've seen a lot of great players in London: Jason Allison, Rico Fata (he was great in junior b/c of his speed, i know hes not great now), Rick Nash and others and IMO Schremp has the best offensive talent than anyone i've seen. Yes thats incluidng Rick Nash. But!!!!!! Nash and others had a much more physical elementand overall size and grit to there game then Schremp. But offenseive skills and creativity he's the best.
Without Perry and Hunter, Schremp and Bolland would be the #1 duo in London and probably still in the league for that matter, he is that damn talented. His defence is IMPROVING and he is for some reason hitting this year (never saw him do that last year).
IMO Perry and Hunter have more points b/c they have alot more assists and its much easier to get assists than goals (robbie leads OHL in goals). Many of Perry and Hunters assists are to Schremp as well !!
To all the Schremp bashers read this part from Bobs article:
"There's no question his offensive pyrotechnics have a been a factor in a seeming USA Hockey change of mind, but what's apparently impressed Team USA the most is how hard Schremp has worked and how much he wants to be a part of the team. And it doesn't hurt that he has game-breaking qualities that could come in handy in a crucial game against, say, Canada."
Exactly what i've been saying for awhile now.