blundluntman
Registered User
- Jul 30, 2016
- 2,657
- 2,851
We can go with mid 90s (before the start of the clutch and grab era)During which era?
Completely different leagues though. the NHL isnt even remotely close to how it was back then.McDavid at his very best is more healthy and durable than Lindros.
Nothing to take away from Lindros because he was an absolute beast at his peak.
Some people are looking back at Lindros with rose tinted glasses. His best scoring finishes are 1, (in a shortened season), 6, 7.People are forgetting just how good Lindros was, geez. I know he had a short career and got injured but before the concussion issues he was as good as anyone.
McDavid will have the better career, but in a vacuum I'd take Lindros.
I'm really not sure where this came from and I keep hearing it more and more. Outside of McDavid's outlier North Division season, where he piled up points against awful defenses in a Covid-ravaged league, his season-to-season output is pretty much comparable to Sid and OV. And, yet, no one said that either of those two were more skilled than Gretzky or Lemieux. Just because he's the fastest player, doesn't mean he's the best.McDavid is the most purely skilled player to ever play the game. Not to be confused with the player who has had the best career. If you're talking pure talent, there's no one that's ever had more than McDavid. His ability to play the game at the speed he plays it at and make the moves and plays that he does at that speed is something we've never seen before and will probably never see again.
With all of that said, Lindros changed the game entirely. He changed the way teams drafted players and built their teams. Everyone needed defensemen and forwards that could match up against Lindros and everyone was hoping that the next 6'4-6'5 center with talent that would come along in the draft could match Lindros in skill and physicality.
You really have to wonder how McDavid would produce with 90's style hockey. The amount of calls they got away with back then was sickening.
I'm really not sure where this came from. Outside of McDavid's outlier North Division season, where he piled up points against awful defenses in a Covid-ravaged league, his season-to-season output is pretty much comparable to Sid and OV. And, yet, no one said that either of those two were more skilled than Gretzky or Lemieux.
You mean this last season, where he barely edged out Jonathan Huberdeau and Johnny Gaudreau in the scoring race?I forgot, did McDavid play in the North division again this year?
You mean this last season, where he barely edged out Jonathan Huberdeau and Johnny Gaudreau?
Lemieux would lap the field against talents like Jagr and Sakic and Gretzky would outscore his HHOF teammates with assists alone.
You mean this last season, where he barely edged out Jonathan Huberdeau and Johnny Gaudreau in the scoring race?
Lemieux would lap the field against talents like Jagr and Sakic and Gretzky would outscore his HHOF teammates with assists alone. McDavid is simply not on their level, no matter how hard some would like it to be the case.