It was never about points. Kessel was never better than Bergeron because he out scored him. Matthews being better than Eichel is about more than points. He's stronger, more dominant in cycles, forechecking, away from the puck, around the net, and on faceoffs. His defensive game and compete level are on another level than Eichel.
Eichel can score 95 points, and Matthews can score 85, and that doesn't change anything. He won't get the respect until he does it in the playoffs, and then people will realize he is cut from a different cloth.[/QUOTE]
Just a second I was going to leave this alone because of the small sample size.
If Matthews is WAY BETTER or LIGHT YEARS ahead of EIchel as Leaf Fans have claimed, and is even better offensively, will you still claim this if Eichel out produces Matthews in points per game again?
He has more points then Matthews on a way worse team, offensively. Eichel is the catalyst to Buffalo's offense, TOronto has many other weapons.
Saying Bergeron in your example is a flawed argument because Bergeron is precisely known for his 2 way game and has won 4 Selke's, Matthews hasn't even been thought to of been nominated for one.
Plus, the main point Matthews fanatics have driven home is EIchel has never reached 60 pts despite reaching the mid 50's in both os hif seasons despite being injured for two months in one of them.
SO now Eichel passes Matthews in points and "POINTS" are never what it was about?
Pretty convenient i'd say.[/QUOTE]