KevinRedkey
12/18/23 and beyond!
- Jan 22, 2010
- 9,932
- 4,871
Patches isn't a great driver, and he never had a good center in MTL. With Stone and Stastny driving the play, Patches is in a much better spot to showcase his talents.
Lol k buds. Sorry you got triggered.Talking about Patches here, not Phaneuf.
HF would generally say he wasn't worth the price tag because he disapeared in the playoffs. With his play so far, I think he's proving people wrong.
I always thought Patches was in a similar situation to Phil Kessel. He is a complimentary winger who was the best scorer on weak offensive teams so was being asked unrealistically to carry the team. Just not going to happen. In the playoffs especially the opposing team deploys concentrated defensive schemes to shut down your top forwards (why 3rd lines often do so well), so that meant Kessel & Pacioretty who were not gamebreaking players, got absolutely smothered. Not difficult to see why they had trouble producing.
After what happened with Kessel on the much deeper Pens offence it's not all that surprising to see Patches doing better on a deep offensive team in Vegas. He probably could have had a bounceback year in Montreal with the upgraded offence surrounding him but it was probably better for everyone that he moved on.
If the Sharks could get even average goaltending or maybe just not let a goal in the first minute of every period this series would be much different.
I think it's a good analyis but Kessel is more of a game breaker who can create his own shot. Patch cant. But clearly he's a smart player who can rip it. He's on a great line right now. Good for him. Vegas looks unbeatable right now and they were my pick for the Finals . Along with TB of course.I always thought Patches was in a similar situation to Phil Kessel. He is a complimentary winger who was the best scorer on weak offensive teams so was being asked unrealistically to carry the team. Just not going to happen. In the playoffs especially the opposing team deploys concentrated defensive schemes to shut down your top forwards (why 3rd lines often do so well), so that meant Kessel & Pacioretty who were not gamebreaking players, got absolutely smothered. Not difficult to see why they had trouble producing.
After what happened with Kessel on the much deeper Pens offence it's not all that surprising to see Patches doing better on a deep offensive team in Vegas. He probably could have had a bounceback year in Montreal with the upgraded offence surrounding him but it was probably better for everyone that he moved on.
The games would be closer but Vegas would still win.If the Sharks could get even average goaltending or maybe just not let a goal in the first minute of every period this series would be much different.
Not sure how you can say kessel wasnt a game breaker. Was ppg in playoffs with both Boston and Toronto, and absolutely carried Torontos offense.
Say whatever yo want about effort or defense or whatever, an 80-90 point, 35 goal guy who can carry a line and come up in the playoffs is generally considered a game breaking talent.
In the playoffs especially the opposing team deploys concentrated defensive schemes to shut down your top forwards (why 3rd lines often do so well), so that meant Kessel & Pacioretty who were not gamebreaking players, got absolutely smothered. Not difficult to see why they had trouble producing.
Perception in Toronto was that he wasn't so he was run out of town.
They havent done well in 50 years. If anything they are delusional in thinking they are actually a good team.Since when does anyone take Toronto fans seriously? They run everybody out of town if the team doesn't do well.
I don't really think you know anything about Kessel.
Yes, I get what you are saying. The thing is his stats were worse then his actual playoff play. But most of the people having these kind of opinions either didn't watch him play (stats watching) or only had a short memory and only remembered his last playoffs agaisnt the Rangers.To be fair to those people, nothing he does now will make them wrong about the fact that at the time of the trade his playoff track record was poor.
I think who he's proving wrong are the people who obsess over which players are "playoff performers". It's the same sport in the regular season and playoffs. Good players are good players and most of the time poor performances in small sample sizes are a product of circumstance and bad luck, not some inability to play in "big games".
The games would be closer but Vegas would still win.
And people love to point out "if the goal tending was different". Well it's a pretty darn important part of your team. How about allocating some resources there?
FYI, the Habs players voted Pacioretty as captain. He was obviously respected in the room, but it became clear he lacked the temperament to actually lead people.He's actually disapointed me during the regular season so I am glad to see him having a good playoff stretch.
I am not in his head, but I think most people think the same: In Montreal, his problems were not his talent (he obviously is very talented), but I think his personality did not mesh with the role he had been put in. In interviews he gives off a very introverted vibe.
And next thing you know, the coaches name him captain ffs ! Along with being the best goalscorer by a mile (Gallagher was not scoring 30 5 years ago), it was just a ****show for someone who was not a big public face
FYI, the Habs players voted Pacioretty as captain. He was obviously respected in the room, but it became clear he lacked the temperament to actually lead people.