Alwalys
Phu m.
- May 19, 2010
- 25,894
- 6,140
Is this real life? Someone said that SJS fans never would have said Nieto was 'untouchable,' in whatever arbitrary internet parlance that means. They were promptly proven wrong with concrete examples from a series of different posters. Almost all of the examples I cited were from a poster who features very prominently on any topics related to San Jose.
"it's pretty hacky" to sidestep what were ridiculous claims 2-3 years ago and act like people on your end didn't massively overrate a player who has now been waived. It was the same with people who called *ahem* certain posters out on the McIlrath topic earlier this season.
That it came full circle for Nieto provides me with no great satisfaction, though calling out posters who say one thing only to flop onto the other side when their Nostradamus like predictions fall flat certainly is satisfying. Particularly when it is a poster (who will remain unnamed) who continually acts like their opinion is the gospel truth.
This will certainly be my last post on this topic but if you try to flip this one as well, you would do well to have a go at the LSAT
well there was only one guy that used that word, and he's one of the few on my ignore list so I won't defend him too much. he is an outlier so you don't get to parade him around as if he represents sharks fans.
the others clearly correctly contextualized their statement in terms of his prospects. his future did look bright at one point. now that it doesn't, it is in fact hacky to bang on about it unless AT THAT TIME you disputed the claims with well-supported counterclaims that came true.
did you?