Alwalys
Phu m.
- May 19, 2010
- 25,894
- 6,140
Hedican's comments absolutely blew me away, mostly because, they were not necessary. First of all the team won, and secondly, there's no reason to call attention to Havlat, as the team has played very well without him. I understand that everyone wants Havlat to be healthy, and to get all they can from him. But he's essentially been an afterthought for the entire playoff run, and taking shots at him when the team has been playing well is just plain stupid. Also, why is Hedican making it sound like Havlat is in full control of whether or not he plays. McLellan has a huge say in this, along with the trainers and doctors. If they let him play, and he re-aggravates his injury, or injures something new, well that just ****ing sucks, but you can't put all the blame on the player. He thought he could play, and more importantly, he wanted to play, and fight through the pain, just so he could help. It didn't work out, but that isn't something you should hold against someone. This whole situation has become so overblown, it's kind of shocking.
I did not see his comments directly but I get the gist and I'd have to agree with this assessment.
It seems like a strange situation all around. It's not like there aren't players with frustrating injury situations all around the league. It makes me wonder a little bit ... what line was he on when he played? Could there have been another issue entirely?