There is a big edge to Stone defensively. And offensively.Mark Stone.
Under the assumption, they're both equal defensively. (Slight edge to Stone)
Stone is alot better offensively. I feel like he can drive his line.
I'll say Stone. Simmonds is a good net front presence, but Stone is a better player.
You have multiple Flyers fans disagreeing with you.I don't agree.
Simmonds puts up VERY similar numbers year in and year out, scores more goals, is consistent, and is a tough, physical presence. I'd love him on my team. Stone is a good player, but Simmonds wins this comparison, IMO.
You have multiple Flyers fans disagreeing with you.
No its definitely wrong. Stone carries his line whoever is on it. Pageau and Smith should be giving him a cut every pay cheque. It doesnt take much research to look into who produces above their career average on the sens and when it happens.Um.......so what? What does that have to do with anything?
It's still my opinion. My opinion is not wrong. LOL.
Opinions can be wrong. Yours is an example of one. Unless of course you are ok having a lesser player.Um.......so what? What does that have to do with anything?
It's still my opinion. My opinion is not wrong. LOL.
Opinions can be wrong. Yours is an example of one. Unless of course you are ok having a lesser player.
Sorry....you are wrong.LOL. No. Simmonds is DEF. the better player here. Some of you Philly fans simply can't see it. Maybe y'all don't really know your hockey that well. Maybe stick to the football?