hockeydog23
Registered User
- Aug 21, 2020
- 104
- 83
All are 4th or 6th overall picks from 2016-2020. To give last years rookies a bit more time to develop, which pair you got for a 2024 cup run in two years? No contracts consideration.
Why strange? My reasoning was all young stars drafted in basically same slot over last few years. Go ask wings fans and I’d guess half of them would probably tell you they wouldn’t trade Seider for Makar. Seider is legit both ways and could easily win Norris in next few years. Older tkachuk coming off a 104 pt season as an elite wing who’s also an agitator. Byram has lots of upside but concussion risk. Raymond started hot as a rookie, and Brady tkachuk might break into 40 goal, 90 pt territory this year.Very strange comparisons, Makar and Byram is the clear choice to me.
I might take Makar alone over the other duo's
Just because guys were drafted in the same spots in adjacent drafts doesn't make the comparisons make sense. First of all you have 2 defenseman vs 2 forwards vs 1 of each, hard to compare duos when they aren't the same positions. Second of all players are at completely different stages of their career/development. Wings fans step forth if you would trade Seider for Makar, because if you would you should have your talking hockey card provoked. One is already the best defenseman in the league, absolute best case scenario the other becomes close to the player Makar is now at his prime. Same goes for Tkachuk (Matthew) vs Raymond. A 2016 draft player who is already a 100 point guy vs a 2020 draft player who looks like a budding superstar but is not nearly at that level yet. 2016 vs 2020 is a huge gapWhy strange? My reasoning was all young stars drafted in basically same slot over last few years. Go ask wings fans and I’d guess half of them would probably tell you they wouldn’t trade Seider for Makar. Seider is legit both ways and could easily win Norris in next few years. Older tkachuk coming off a 104 pt season as an elite wing who’s also an agitator. Byram has lots of upside but concussion risk. Raymond started hot as a rookie, and Brady tkachuk might break into 40 goal, 90 pt territory this year.
Why strange? My reasoning was all young stars drafted in basically same slot over last few years. Go ask wings fans and I’d guess half of them would probably tell you they wouldn’t trade Seider for Makar. Seider is legit both ways and could easily win Norris in next few years. Older tkachuk coming off a 104 pt season as an elite wing who’s also an agitator. Byram has lots of upside but concussion risk. Raymond started hot as a rookie, and Brady tkachuk might break into 40 goal, 90 pt territory this year.
I don't know if its a fact about Wings fans, but definitely is my sense. They're pretty high on him. He scored 50 points as a rookie on a team devoid of talent while physically dominating men. He's already very good, and has the potential to be great. The poll is also about which set of players you'd want for a cup run in 2024. By then Seider might be competing for Norris's with Makar (and maybe Byram).The fact that the majority of Wings fans would take Seider over Makar tells you a lot about their ability to assess the game of hockey.
There are posts all the time that compare forwards and dmen. There was a Makar v. Matthews post recently. You're entitled to your opinion but this is a group of superstar or superstar trajectory players all drafted in the same spot in a relatively short period of time. While Makar v. Fox or Dahlin v. Power threads are more obvious comparisons, those threads are pretty worn out and just end up being a pissing match between fans. Thought it would be fun to discuss this one, especially given how bullish the Red Wings are on Seider (and should be).Just because guys were drafted in the same spots in adjacent drafts doesn't make the comparisons make sense. First of all you have 2 defenseman vs 2 forwards vs 1 of each, hard to compare duos when they aren't the same positions. Second of all players are at completely different stages of their career/development. Wings fans step forth if you would trade Seider for Makar, because if you would you should have your talking hockey card provoked. One is already the best defenseman in the league, absolute best case scenario the other becomes close to the player Makar is now at his prime. Same goes for Tkachuk (Matthew) vs Raymond. A 2016 draft player who is already a 100 point guy vs a 2020 draft player who looks like a budding superstar but is not nearly at that level yet. 2016 vs 2020 is a huge gap
While Makar v. Fox or Dahlin v. Power threads are more obvious comparisons, those threads are pretty worn out and just end up being a pissing match between fans.
I wouldn’t trade Byram for Seider. Byram is the better player. But both will be in the Norris discussion in a few years.I wouldn't trade Makar for any of the other duos
If your ability to assess the game of hockey is so good, I'd love to hear a coherent argument on why Seider can't possibly be right up there with Makar in 2-3 years.The fact that the majority of Wings fans would take Seider over Makar tells you a lot about their ability to assess the game of hockey.
I could possibly be up there with Makar in 2-3 years but believe me, it wont happen.If your ability to assess the game of hockey is so good, I'd love to hear a coherent argument on why Seider can't possibly be right up there with Makar in 2-3 years.
Several Avs fans say the same thing about Byram.If your ability to assess the game of hockey is so good, I'd love to hear a coherent argument on why Seider can't possibly be right up there with Makar in 2-3 years.