Remember when the team picked up Lehner and tried to say Fleury shouldn’t be threatened by it, that it wasn’t an insult, etc? I always liked the trade, but of course it was a threat to Fleury as he lost his starting job for a while, and then was traded between 1-2 years later.
I think this post below is a solid take on the quoted one above:
They chose to move forward with a younger guy locked up with a cheaper deal. There is more to player evaluation than who was playing better last time they were on the ice.
Fact of the matter is MAFs popularity was always going to bring problems. No way he deserved the extension he got, but that was the team paying for past results.
That last paragraph 1,000 times.
Also noticed a few things…..
Fleury’s GAA over career is
2.55; SV%
.913….
Lehner’s GAA over career is
2.69, SV%
.918.
A slightly better save percentage and the difference of a about a single goal across 21 periods of hockey (.14 x 7 = .98).
I think the Knights will be fine……I feel the act of keeping the goalie ready to fall off of a cliff is something that a franchise does to give a guy a last hurrah if operating upon the basis that there won’t be a logical shot at a Cup.
I get that he wanted to retire in Vegas, but his stability-versus-brainfarts, age and contract all make each other way less compatible. The only thing I’d change is the method by which he found out - FO as opposed to Twitter. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯