Adding too much spice to an already decent meal will ruin itSo I am assuming the Knights have used up approximately 26 cards meaning what 4 cards left?
My thought is they should strategically use these cards on:
1. Mailloux
2. Import (Steklov if he comes back or Gushchin from Niagara or Zanetti from PBO) If none of those options work go for an OA
3. OA (Xhekaj from the Rangers, Sproule from PBO if they are selling, Petizan from the Rangers)
4. Star Player (Thompson from Sudbury, McTavish from PBO, Othmann from Flint, Cuylle from Windsor)
Ideally we get back Mailloux and Steklov somehow magically comes back (seems like he is doing okay in Russia) This would solidify our D core quite a bit though and not sure if we would need Thompson or Xhekaj, but I am sure both would be nice additions.... I still hold to the fact we need more offence both from the back end and up front.
true enough OTTO. I think if somehow we do add with no subtraction (Mailloux and potentially Steklov) Thats already a solid addition....with that being said wouldnt McTavish look good in a Knights uni? That kids is a truck! goal scoring machine, good on the dot, leader...would be our #1CAdding too much spice to an already decent meal will ruin it
Anyone have the link to the fellow who tracks draft picks?
From my records London next two drafts look like:
2022 -1st, 2nd, 5th, 6th, 6th (Owen sound), 6th (Erie), 7-15th (London original picks), 15 (Niagara)
2023 -1st, 3rd, 3rd NB, 5th, 6th, 6th Erie, 7-10th, 10th Missy, 11th-15th (London’s own picks), 12th Missy, 15th Windsor. I think London sent a conditional 4th pick to Kingston but not sure if those conditions have been satisfied.
can anyone confirm ?
I'm not worried what McTavish would look like in a Knights uniform. I'm worried about what any players used to acquire him are going to look like in their new uniforms.true enough OTTO. I think if somehow we do add with no subtraction (Mailloux and potentially Steklov) Thats already a solid addition....with that being said wouldnt McTavish look good in a Knights uni? That kids is a truck! goal scoring machine, good on the dot, leader...would be our #1C
Any trade for McTavish would likely include a team’s 16 year old 1st rounder, picks, then multiple conditional picks should he play in this league next year.
A Rob Thomas to Hamilton type deal.
I like Bujolds game alot! Rolofs just floats around to much in my opinionIt’s a shame that neither Bujold or Rolofs have become top talents, because it makes Barkey much more difficult to trade. There’s a solid group of 04s, but no real elite talents that can buffer the loss of Barkey in the years to come.
I like Bujolds game alot! Rolofs just floats around to much in my opinion
My goodness man.. Rolofs has played 43 games in the league.. with a season cancelled.. Bujold is 16 games into his OHL career... let's give them some time before we completely write them offIt’s a shame that neither Bujold or Rolofs have become top talents, because it makes Barkey much more difficult to trade. There’s a solid group of 04s, but no real elite talents that can buffer the loss of Barkey in the years to come.
For sure, but currently the guys the Knights picked after them are outperforming themMy goodness man.. Rolofs has played 43 games in the league.. with a season cancelled.. Bujold is 16 games into his OHL career... let's give them some time before we completely write them off
Xman is the guyBujould definitely needs to get stronger.Very weak along the boards.
Rolofs has improved and is using his size more and can put the puck in the net.
Would like to see a Veteran D man with skill and physicallity.
I was just making that comparison the other day, Bujold = Moskal.Bujold has good speed and defense, but at the end of the day, he's pretty much Billy Moskal 2.0 (not a bad player, just not worthy of McTavish in a trade).