Pre-Game Talk: Lightning vs Leafs | January 28th, 7pm EST | TSN

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pi

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
48,942
14,021
Toronto
Healy might as well count down the days until Rogers replaces him. Time to start looking for work south of the border.

I hope so. I don't mind constructive criticism because we know that our team isn't even close to being as good as we want them to be but Healy is just an idiot who spews random crap.

When we don't win SO's theya re after the Leafs, when we win SO's it gets even worse.
 

LeafOfBread

Registered User
Feb 25, 2010
13,107
0
Mississauga, ON
This will be tough. Tampa usually has our number, and they're an excellent team this year, firing on all cylinders while having great coaching (Jon Cooper is awesome) and playing together as a strong, cohesive unit. Ben Bishop has also been unreal and is having a Vezina-calibre season.

They have lots of young talent and depth on offense and haven't missed a beat despite missing Stamkos...young guys like Johnson, Killorn, Palat, etc have filled the void while their older guys like Filp, Purcell and of course MSL have all been excellent as well.

Even the D has performed very well considering that on paper it's not the best group, but Hedman is having the best season of his career thus far, while Gudas, Carle, and their other depth guys like Sustr, Brewer etc have all played well.

Very impressed with how much they turned things around since last year.
 

FlareKnight

Registered User
Jun 26, 2006
19,822
1,707
Alberta
This will be tough. Tampa usually has our number, and they're an excellent team this year, firing on all cylinders while having great coaching (Jon Cooper is awesome) and playing together as a strong, cohesive unit. Ben Bishop has also been unreal and is having a Vezina-calibre season.

They have lots of young talent and depth on offense and haven't missed a beat despite missing Stamkos...young guys like Johnson, Killorn, Palat, etc have filled the void while their older guys like Filp, Purcell and of course MSL have all been excellent as well.

Even the D has performed very well considering that on paper it's not the best group, but Hedman is having the best season of his career thus far, while Gudas, Carle, and their other depth guys like Sustr, Brewer etc have all played well.

Very impressed with how much they turned things around since last year.
So basically the odds are so stacked against us that the universe has to give us a break and let us win right :laugh:?
 

LeafOfBread

Registered User
Feb 25, 2010
13,107
0
Mississauga, ON
Bishop actually has some ugly, ugly numbers vs the Leafs...

5GP, 2-3-0, .872 sv%, 3.24 GAA :amazed:

Of course, it might've just been Ottawa syndrome since I believe all but 1 of those games came with the Sens. And the Sens have pretty much been our ***** for a few years now.
 

Paradoc

John Tavares is a Leaf!
Mar 13, 2013
15,376
2,550
Toronto
Hedman has 6 points in his last 2 games. He's been playing very well for a defenseman who was suppose to be labeled as a bust a couple of seasons ago.
 

Hotlanta

Registered User
Dec 1, 2009
1,784
2
Hedman has 6 points in his last 2 games. He's been playing very well for a defenseman who was suppose to be labeled as a bust a couple of seasons ago.

When was he labelled a bust? But I wouldn't be surprised since people are labelling Larsson a bust and he is on the same learning curve. You can never call a D a bust till they are at least 25 (Cody Franson :sarcasm:). Usually takes them till at least 27 to hit their prime.
 

Pi

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
48,942
14,021
Toronto
When was he labelled a bust? But I wouldn't be surprised since people are labelling Larsson a bust and he is on the same learning curve. You can never call a D a bust till they are at least 25 (Cody Franson :sarcasm:). Usually takes them till at least 27 to hit their prime.

Larsson isn't a bust...he's just had a lot of downs in his career and the coaching in NJ hasn't helped much either.

I would love to find a way to get Larsson on our team. IMO, he's a guy that can definitely play 20-25 minutes of good hockey when he develops.

Top pairing D potential.
 

Schennanigans

Registered User
Dec 26, 2008
7,533
681
Etobicoke, on
I didn't realize we got out of the wildcard spot and now 3rd in division. Would be great if we can keep moving forward. Though Montreal with 2 games in hand. Hope we can get back in the win column.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,112
12,324
Leafs Home Board
Talk about not using injuries as an excuse for failure.

Lightning are the poster child to support this, as missing Stamkos one of the best players on the planet and not missing a beat as a team tied for 2nd in the Eastern conference standings.

Our Leafs are not missing a Stamkos but are not able to keep up with the Lightening. TB finished 3rd last overall last season while the Leafs made the playoffs.

Why are TB outperforming the Leafs this year?
 

Igy

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
2,097
2
Talk about not using injuries as an excuse for failure.

Lightning are the poster child to support this, as missing Stamkos one of the best players on the planet and not missing a beat as a team tied for 2nd in the Eastern conference standings.

Our Leafs are not missing a Stamkos but are not able to keep up with the Lightening. TB finished 3rd last overall last season while the Leafs made the playoffs.

Why are TB outperforming the Leafs this year?

Great coaching.
 

Pi

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
48,942
14,021
Toronto
Talk about not using injuries as an excuse for failure.

Lightning are the poster child to support this, as missing Stamkos one of the best players on the planet and not missing a beat as a team tied for 2nd in the Eastern conference standings.

Our Leafs are not missing a Stamkos but are not able to keep up with the Lightening. TB finished 3rd last overall last season while the Leafs made the playoffs.

Why are TB outperforming the Leafs this year?

Coaching is miles better and so is the system.

With the Leafs...you still have no idea what kind of team you are going to get on any given day.

Tampa comes to play every night and is dialed in...
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,112
12,324
Leafs Home Board
Better goaltending. Bishop is finally making them relevant in between the pipes.

Using TB as a gauge to measure the Leafs progress.

So Ben Bishop at .934 sv% > Bernier @ .925

Therefore TB (without Stamkos) > Leafs in standings.

Where would TB be with Stamkos Cup competitors?

TB was a bottom 5 lottery team last season, just like our Leafs the prior one (Rielly), why aren't we seeing similar team improvement with goaltending improvement?

If not for Bernier (7th best sv%) would Leafs be a lottery team? Similarly if Leafs were missing their best player Kessel for months would they be better or worse in the standings?
 
Last edited:

Schennanigans

Registered User
Dec 26, 2008
7,533
681
Etobicoke, on
Using TB as a gauge to measure the Leafs progress.

So Ben Bishop at .934 sv% > Bernier @ .925

Therefore TB (without Stamkos) > Leafs in standings.

Where would TB be with Stamkos Cup competitors?

TB was a bottom 5 lottery team last season, just like our Leafs the prior one (Rielly), why aren't we seeing similar team improvement with goaltending improvement?

If not for Bernier (7th best sv%) would Leafs be a lottery team? Similarly if Leafs were missing their best player Kessel for months would they be better or worse in the standings?

TB will be where they are now or up there with the other top 2 with Stamkos. The Leafs would not be a lottery team without Bernier, Reimer is still almost as good. If we were missing Kessel we'd be worse. We don't get a lot of scoring outside of that line.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,112
12,324
Leafs Home Board
TB will be where they are now or up there with the other top 2 with Stamkos. The Leafs would not be a lottery team without Bernier, Reimer is still almost as good. If we were missing Kessel we'd be worse. We don't get a lot of scoring outside of that line.

With or without the Rocket Richard trophy candidate Stamkos TB would be in a similar position?

They seem to be playing extremely well without him, but that seems hard to believe that he has no impact on the team results. :help:
 

Pi

Registered User
Nov 16, 2010
48,942
14,021
Toronto
With or without the Rocket Richard trophy candidate Stamkos TB would be in a similar position?

They seem to be playing extremely well without him, but that seems hard to believe that he has no impact on the team results. :help:

Not really.

Pittsburgh played well without Sidney Crosby and they are playing at the same level with him.

When a team loses it's star player, the team comes together and performs at a higher level to make up for it.

Look at the Sens last year...everyone said: "WOW, look at this Sens team without Karlsson, Spezza, Michalek"

The media hopped right into the bandwagon: "They are Cup contenders with a healthy Spezza, Karlsson and Michalek" :laugh: Look at them now...right where we expected them to be.

It's a fairly simple concept: Lose a star player, other players on the team step up to fill their void.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,112
12,324
Leafs Home Board
Not really.

Pittsburgh played well without Sidney Crosby and they are playing at the same level with him.

When a team loses it's star player, the team comes together and performs at a higher level to make up for it.

Look at the Sens last year...everyone said: "WOW, look at this Sens team without Karlsson, Spezza, Michalek"

The media hopped right into the bandwagon: "They are Cup contenders with a healthy Spezza, Karlsson and Michalek" :laugh:

It's a fairly simple concept: Lose a star player, other players on the team step up to fill their void.

Would that be true for Toronto is they were missing Kessel for an extended period of time?

How come Leafs struggles were blamed on missing secondary players like Bozak and Bolland, when teams even absorb the loss of star players like Stamkos and continue to have success?.

Your theory doesn't seem to apply to our Leafs.
 

Schennanigans

Registered User
Dec 26, 2008
7,533
681
Etobicoke, on
With or without the Rocket Richard trophy candidate Stamkos TB would be in a similar position?

They seem to be playing extremely well without him, but that seems hard to believe that he has no impact on the team results. :help:

Well with him who's to say that they wouldn't be better and perhaps the favorite to capture the presidents trophy. Like I said they would be the same or better, but probably better.
 

JackJ

Registered User
Feb 7, 2012
5,330
0
David Alter ‏@DavidAlter590 7m
Leafs lines at practice
JVR-Bozak-Kessel
Lupul-Kadri-Kulemin
Raymond-Holland-Bodie
Ashton-McClement-Orr-McLaren
Bolland-Smith

Solid line.
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,112
12,324
Leafs Home Board
Well with him who's to say that they wouldn't be better and perhaps the favorite to capture the presidents trophy. Like I said they would be the same or better, but probably better.

I think it suggests TB is a solid team because even if you take away one of the top players in the NHL they continue to perform as a top team in the conference.

I don't think our Leafs could do that.

If TB beats our Leafs despite one hand tied behind their back (missing Stamkos) it does make a statement towards our Leafs and their competitiveness in comparison. Stamkos is often a Leaf killer in past Leaf losses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad