X66
114-110
- Aug 18, 2008
- 13,578
- 7,445
I thought it was all 3 of those reasons.
Outside of game 2 last year the Leafs were the more physical team.
But they couldn't kill a single penalty, largely due to Babcock not adapting.
I thought it was all 3 of those reasons.
Your prior post you said tougher. I don't think there was any question the Bruins were a tougher Team.Outside of game 2 last year the Leafs were the more physical team.
But they couldn't kill a single penalty, largely due to Babcock not adapting.
It would go game by game, not the entire series.Who gets last change in this series?
I am hoping Clifford can make some of our guys play a foot taller but overall lets hope we don't get pushed around ... hits are one thing but that is subject to who/how a hit is recorded ... being tough/strong on puck is more importantYour prior post you said tougher. I don't think there was any question the Bruins were a tougher Team.
I agreed they were out coached and out skilled.
To bring it back on topic, the Leafs won't be the tougher team in this series either and they shouldn't need to be.
Your prior post you said tougher. I don't think there was any question the Bruins were a tougher Team.
I agreed they were out coached and out skilled.
To bring it back on topic, the Leafs won't be the tougher team in this series either and they shouldn't need to be.
Yes I agreed with that earlier.The point is the Bruins didn't win the series because of physicality or toughness.
I don't think da bruins can keep up smash mouthing teams for a full 60 minutes anymore ... they don't have da endurance anymore with age ... but they can do it at certain points in a game to gain momentum and advantage ... but you are right only game we got completely intimidated was game 2 ... but there were points in other games where it occuredThe point is the Bruins didn't win the series because of physicality or toughness.
Really no different than any series ever played where one team is vastly superior offensively than the other.
Leafs will focus on scoring more than Columbus.
Columbus will focus on giving up less than the Leafs.
Gotcha, so when you said they'd review the TOR v. BOS series to implement similar tactics you actually meant they'd ignore that and instead re-deploy their successful system from last year's first round that had nothing to do with the Leafs.Torts held the #1 offense in hockey TB with the leagues MVP coming off a 62 win season and 320 GF to just 8 goals in the entire series.
Kucherov, Stamkos, Point and Johnson combined for 153 regular season goals and managed only 2 goals and 6 points combined in those 4 games combined and only 1 PP goal the entire series.
That similar defensive game plan and PK% system will attempt to replicate that strategy and do that this time to Matthews, Tavares, Nylander and Marner in this series.
If successful I don't think our Leafs will advance into the playoffs, as I can't see Leafs winning without impactful contributions from Leafs 4 gifted offensive players, while holding the entire Leafs team to 2 goals or less a game as even with all the offensive departures this CBJ team still have a top 3 defense via GA and strong top 5 goaltending.
Torts doesn't need a magic trick to make the best line in hockey reappear on his team, as his #1 objective is to make Leafs best offensive players disappear from the series instead just like he did to TB last year.
If the Leafs can muster 3 or more goals a game, then CBJ has NO chance in this series and it will be short and sweet even though Leafs defense and goaltending is unpredictable, because CBJ lacks the offensive fire power to compete offensively. IMO
I'm not sold the Jackets are going to be playing that tight defensively. After a regular off-season defensive structures are normally really, really off, even for the strong defensive teams. When play resumes they'll have had maybe even more time off than normal.I believe Columbus will come well-preppared and play a strong defensive game. The questions will be:
- How does Columbus' goaltending hold up?
- Can the Leafs demonstrate responsible puck management and avoid high danger chances against off of turnovers?
- Can Andy perform under these circumstances?
- Can the Leafs win the special teams battle and make their PP their biggest threat?
Quite possibly although after a normal off season of roster changes players need some time to get use to each other, this won't be the case now.I'm not sold the Jackets are going to be playing that tight defensively. After a regular off-season defensive structures are normally really, really off, even for the strong defensive teams. When play resumes they'll have had maybe even more time off than normal.
We'll see. I think this series is going to be more of a goalfest than people think.Quite possibly although after a normal off season of roster changes players need some time to get use to each other, this won't be the case now.
Leafs will win that type of series.We'll see. I think this series is going to be more of a goalfest than people think.
I'm not sold the Jackets are going to be playing that tight defensively. After a regular off-season defensive structures are normally really, really off, even for the strong defensive teams. When play resumes they'll have had maybe even more time off than normal.
Who gets last change in this series?
Zeke.yup. CBJ has received much better goaltending than the leafs.
so that better change.
promisingly, Freddy ended the year on a 5-1-1 run thanks to .931sv%, and seemed on his way back to salvaging the year and ending up near his typical .917-.918 level.
Merzlikins on the other hand ended the year on a 1-3-4 run thanks to .900 goaltending, and has no track record to speak of. His rookie year has been a strange one:
1. 10gms: 0-4-4, .889
2. 14gms: 12-2-0, .953
3. 9gms: 1-3-4, .900
Do we look at his average? or did he just get one of those fluke rookie streaks before the league started to figure it out?
we'll see.
Zeke.
Other thread locked.
Not too fancy numbers.
Fair point.
Small sample size?
Would like to have seen Babcock get some love for what he did with Leafs.
Better numbers?
I have no clue.
I know they had more success.
5 of 6 to O.T. with Wsh.
2 7 game series against Bos.
Points record.
Hard to argue with his coaching job while here.
Sure he made mistakes.
All coaches do.
Jury still out on Keefe I would say.
I get some like the numbers but I'm not a fan of the expected Yada Yada.
You're miles better than Tanner though.
You do provide much detail and it seems like you really do care.
True Leaf fan.
Much respect for that.
Hope you were sitting down for that.
I think they key is not to go in with the mindset that we have to change to match Columbus. That was a problem against Boston we deviated from our style and tried to match theirs and we are obviously not built for it.
We should be dictating how the game is played because Columbus lacks the firepower to hang with us in our style. Let them play heavy while we dance around with speed and skill and draw penalties then make them pay on the PP much like Boston did to us.
Agreed. IIRC Babcock said this a few years ago - that at some point when we got good enough, teams would be trying to match up with us instead of it being the other way around. Depends on the opponent of course and yes when it comes to Columbus, we should not be afraid to just play our game.
I think the big questions are whether our effort and goaltending show up, those were the big issues throughout the season IMOI believe Columbus will come well-preppared and play a strong defensive game. The questions will be:
- How does Columbus' goaltending hold up?
- Can the Leafs demonstrate responsible puck management and avoid high danger chances against off of turnovers?
- Can Andy perform under these circumstances?
- Can the Leafs win the special teams battle and make their PP their biggest threat?