Lets see here. JFJ was hired as an astute smart up an comer, who actually did a pretty good job, yet had no autonomy and couldn't make final decisions without any interference. Next up, the spry and slick senile fox who kept calling Alex Steen, Thomas Steen, basically did a horrible job. Burke then is hired, with a cup under his belt and Leaf fans are reaping the rewards today of his work while employed by MLSE. Yet again, ownership seemed to meddle yet again. So yes, others have done a good job, and putting someone with no NHL experience at the helm, with a President with no NHL management experience behind the wheel is completely moronic. You do realize there are millions and millions of dollars at stake here right?
You do realise that Shanahan before he went into the NHL Department of Player safety was a part of the NHL Hockey and Business Management program completely geared to help grow, expand hockey and the NHL as a whole right? Millions, and millions of dollars at stake here - - yes, so, what's your point?
For the most part - the NHL tends to recycle the same old people. People get fired, then they get hired and it's like, let's see what I did in this place can work here. Some people get better at it (Lombardi) and some people just do the same old bombastic crap (at EVERY LEVEL) - See, Tortorella, John.
From Coaching to Management , I feel there's this bias that people want 'the best ' we have to have people who had cups, we have to have people who have experience, because it's the LEAFS you know - but there's no evidence or basis that would indicate that that would work here. I'm not saying if the choice was between Babcock and Mr New Guy, or Mr New President vs. Rutherford, or Mr New GM (Dubas) vs. ________________________ I'd always pick the new people, but at the same time I wouldn't dismiss them if they could present to me why they'd be the best hire, or if they were capable of doing the job.
And that's what irks me because people throw out 'zero experience." as if they're not capable of doing anything. Simply because someone hasn't had the opportunity to to X doesn't mean people aren't capable, or knowledgeable in jumping into the fire, and knowing what to do, how to do it, and doing it will.
I personally feel that something that hampers everyone (fans & MLSE) alike is that people get so wrapped up in "Oh, so and so has no experience, we need someone with CUP experience ), but people who has won a cup - hell, even people who have been assistant general managers for ages doens't automatically mean they're capable of doing a good job.
Case In Point:
Brian Burke here.
Dave Nonis Here
Randy Carlyle Here
again, people love to go "MLSE meddle" whatever - go with that drama.
I'm not saying that Dubas should be the next/new guy right off the hop - but I think it's disingenuous to say that he'll suck, simply because he doesn't have the pedigree that most people seem to want and/or have.
that's all.