Proposal: Leafs - Canucks

[SHANNYPLAN]

Chris Tanev
for
James VanRiemsdyk
(Flip for 1st at Deadline)
Kerby Rychel
2nd

Canucks add solid pieces for their "rebuild"

leafs d-core improves

Rielly - Tanev
Gardiner - Zaitsev
Borgman - Carrick​

Click to read more...

 

[Dr Quincy]

Rychel is an AHLer, a 2nd doesn't have much value, JVR holds little value for VAN. If you are looking to add a d you are slotting in your first pairing, it will cost more than that.

 

[RebuildinVan]

What he said. JVR not what we need

 

[Highlander23]

since when Tanev was worth 2 first rounders (that's actually the package you are asking for)

 

[Space Coyote]

Kapanen straight up?

 

[ProstheticConscience]

Deep sigh.

 

[Hello Johnny]

since when Tanev was worth 2 first rounders (that's actually the package you are asking for)

And how exactly is he asking for 2 first rounders?

 

[rent free]

babcock wants hainsey and reilly to play together so getting a defesneman wouldn't be necessary

 

[34]

Hell No to Tanev. Straight up, he is useless.

 

[ddawg1950]

Hell No to Tanev. Straight up, he is useless.

Only someone who doesn’t understand the game would say this. However, I am always willing to find room for new fans.
Welcome.

 

[Smeagoal]

Hell No to Tanev. Straight up, he is useless.

No he's not, but keep talking out of your behind.

 

[PensandCaps]

babcock wants hainsey and reilly to play together so getting a defesneman wouldn't be necessary

RIP Reilly...

 

[Nuckles]

Not going to move him for a package, especially one that involves the main piece being an upcoming UFA that could be flipped for a late 1st.

 

[Advanced stats]

Hell No to Tanev. Straight up, he is useless.

As a leafs fan myself, stop saying this.

Tanev would be a welcomed addition to our top 4 and I would trade JVR (flipped for a 1st) + pieces for tanev.

 

[CanadienShark]

Kapanen straight up?

He doesn't hold Tanev value. I'm constantly amazed at how people under rate Tanev. He's an awesome shutdown RHD. He holds a ton of value. He's a great complementary top pair d-man or an elite #3 who carries his pairing. Kapanen is a very good prospect, but really nothing special. He's worth more or less (likely slightly more) than his draft position. I think Tanev is worth much more.

 

[TheMadHatTrick]

This is horrendous for the Canucks and I say this as a Leafs fan. I think if there's going to be a trade it'll be for more than Leafs fans want to give but less than Canucks fans are currently expecting.

 

[Crease Master]

He doesn't hold Tanev value. I'm constantly amazed at how people under rate Tanev. He's an awesome shutdown RHD. He holds a ton of value. He's a great complementary top pair d-man or an elite #3 who carries his pairing. Kapanen is a very good prospect, but really nothing special. He's worth more or less (likely slightly more) than his draft position. I think Tanev is worth much more.

Tanev is Rob Scuderi without all the offensive flair.

 

[TheMadHatTrick]

He doesn't hold Tanev value. I'm constantly amazed at how people under rate Tanev. He's an awesome shutdown RHD. He holds a ton of value. He's a great complementary top pair d-man or an elite #3 who carries his pairing. Kapanen is a very good prospect, but really nothing special. He's worth more or less (likely slightly more) than his draft position. I think Tanev is worth much more.

I don't think most people necessarily underrate him, but are also factoring in his health history in the cost of acquisition. There's the perception rightly or wrongly that he's made of glass.

 

[Tv9924]

Kapanen+2018 2nd? Tanev and Rielly would be one of the best top pairs in the league.

 

[jimslob]

Kapanen+2018 2nd? Tanev and Rielly would be one of the best top pairs in the league.

Please stop, we don't want Kapanen and even your 1st wouldn't do it.

 

[Brock Radunske]

Chris Tanev
for
James VanRiemsdyk
(Flip for 1st at Deadline)
Kerby Rychel
2nd

Canucks add solid pieces for their "rebuild"

leafs d-core improves

Rielly - Tanev
Gardiner - Zaitsev
Borgman - Carrick​

Tanev to Toronto?
What a refreshing idea!

 

[Brock Radunske]

Please stop, we don't want Kapanen and even your 1st wouldn't do it.

It looks like you're quoting a Canucks fan asking for Kapanen + 2nd, not a Leafs fan champ.

If we could send a piece back to make the salary somewhat offset, I'd do KK + 2nd.

 

[34]

As a leafs fan myself, stop saying this.

Tanev would be a welcomed addition to our top 4 and I would trade JVR (flipped for a 1st) + pieces for tanev.

I think Tanev is hot garbage. I have watched him play, he does nothing impressive.

 

[firstemperor]

Rychel is mediocre and quite honestly just waiver fodder give or take.

JVR doesn't have use for the Canucks. There's no point in theorizing what hypothetical he could return. Canucks easily decline.

Hainsey has been great for us, albeit it's two games in. I don't know if you want to move him off of Rielly at this point.

We don't need Tanev until the D experiment is done. Our D has been good for the most part (Gardiner + Rielly's pairing), we gave up a bunch of goals last night because of the PK and poor defense/control of possession by JVR-Bozak-Marner, that's not on the defenders.

On the Canucks end, the value isn't there really unless you know what JVR is returning. 1 game in, it looks like Green and management think this group can compete and win.

 

[Cogburn]

None of those pieces mean anything to us, no, no, no, no, no.