LD Zeev Buium - University of Denver, NCAA (2024 Draft)

Castle8130

Registered User
May 9, 2017
2,768
2,066
He’s made my defenseman rankings really difficult. There are 6 guys that could challenge for #1 (for defensemen) and they all keep getting better:

Buium
Levshunov
Parekh
Silayev
Dickinson
Yakemchuk

I have a really tough time ranking these guys as the year goes on. It will be fun to see where they go on draft day
 

macbowes

Registered User
Aug 1, 2022
333
453
Victoria
How tall is Zeev, 6'0", or 6'2"? Pretty large disparity, but I know that EP pages sometimes update slowly, so he could have grown from when he was listed at 6'0", but NCAA are also notorious for inflating player heights, so his 6'2" listing is a bit suspicious.


 

MNRube

Registered User
Oct 20, 2013
6,106
2,997
How tall is Zeev, 6'0", or 6'2"? Pretty large disparity, but I know that EP pages sometimes update slowly, so he could have grown from when he was listed at 6'0", but NCAA are also notorious for inflating player heights, so his 6'2" listing is a bit suspicious.


I think he’s 6’0. Give or take an inch
 

coooldude

Registered User
Jul 25, 2007
3,319
2,574
It's all ridiculous speculation, but what else is hfboards for? I watched the holiday content special where Will Smith interviewed a bunch of the players on dumb holiday topics, and Zeev was clearly a bit taller (but not much, probably not 2") than Smith. Smith is pretty solidly 6'0". So he's probably 6"0"-6'1", and everyone keeps speculating he'll grow more because his brothers are 6'2" or 6'3".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueston

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
29,248
17,513
The DU measuring is obviously much more recent, could be made up, but the NHL team would likely make it up to the same degree. He's either 6'2 or "6'2" the same way many "6'2" NHL players aren't 6'2. Anyways, he'll be measured at the combine and we'll know then.

It's not like EP would have any more reason to be more accurate right now. The USA WJC roster page also listed him at 6'2.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
48,183
19,893
MN
Just watched Denver against St. Cloud. He looks at least 6', probably bigger. I also thought he was an excellent skater....would call it a strength, rather than a weakness. Was vg with the puck, though nothing flashy. Hard to comment on his defence, as Denver controls the puck so much that he didn't have to defend much.

I watched the game partly to check in on Peart, a MN pick who is known to be a vg skater, and is two years older. Buium already looks like a better skater, bigger, and just flat out better, though Peart's team was on it's heels for a lot of the game.

Very impressive. If he continues to grow, both physically and game wise, i can't see him not being picked in the top 10. There was something about the decisiveness in his game that i liked, but I would like to see him play in a situation where he is hemmed in his own zone more, to see how he performs.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

Drury and Laviolette Must Go
Dec 8, 2013
57,844
23,807
New York
1+3 today. Has 6+26=32 points in 22 games. He's tied for fourth in the country in total points. Leads in defenseman points. Has the same number of points as Celebrini, although in 3 more games. He's having the second best draft-eligible season ever in terms of PPG for a defenseman in the NCAA.

People make a big deal about the offensive season Parekh is having, and he's doing great. But he's only tied 6th total in a junior hockey league in scoring. Buium is tied for 4th, and he's doing that against considerably older competition with a better overall defensive reputation.
 

Ryan Van Horne

aka Scribe
Dec 1, 2005
1,651
726
Halifax
1+3 today. Has 6+26=32 points in 22 games. He's tied for fourth in the country in total points. Leads in defenseman points. Has the same number of points as Celebrini, although in 3 more games. He's having the second best draft-eligible season ever in terms of PPG for a defenseman in the NCAA.

People make a big deal about the offensive season Parekh is having, and he's doing great. But he's only tied 6th total in a junior hockey league in scoring. Buium is tied for 4th, and he's doing that against considerably older competition with a better overall defensive reputation.
All true, but we must also consider that Buium is in his 18-year-old season. He's a late 2005, so complicates the "draft year" comparison a bit.

Celebrini is a year younger playing as a freshman and as for the comparison to Parekh, I think Buium's accomplishments doing what he's doing against NCAA Div. 1 opponents is more impressive than what Parekh is doing in OHL, but would just mitigate the edge a bit because of advanced hockey age.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Buchnevich

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
5,804
5,426
It's all ridiculous speculation, but what else is hfboards for? I watched the holiday content special where Will Smith interviewed a bunch of the players on dumb holiday topics, and Zeev was clearly a bit taller (but not much, probably not 2") than Smith. Smith is pretty solidly 6'0". So he's probably 6"0"-6'1", and everyone keeps speculating he'll grow more because his brothers are 6'2" or 6'3".
Prospect watchers are funny. How often do you come across a family that is all the exact same height
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,071
2,364
Not sure he’s a Top 10 pick yet, but he’s in the conversation to be one of the Top 3-5 dmen off the board.

It’s that time of year, where scouts/teams will start measuring comparative things like how quickly they think and process the game at different levels and speeds, comparing leagues and situations each plays in, etc, etc.

The physical tools have already been evaluated. At least for the most part. Now it’s more about how they’ll translate playing against the best men in the world, how much room they have to grow their game, can they gain the core strength needed to play in the NHL, etc.

To be fair, Buium is in one of the most enviable positions, while someone like Yakemchuk is probably in the worst, playing in Calgary. So they’ll take all that into consideration too.

Think it’s fair to say he’s a Top 20-25 pick at this point. Likely higher, but we’ll start seeing guys move up and down pretty soon here.

It’s also such a top heavy draft with dmen, you’ll see 32 different rankings from the teams. Where a kid like Yakemchuk is the second dman on many lists, and Buium is on others. Really do believe that’s how close 1 through probably 6-7 are. Some will be preference too obviously.

Yakemchuk for example, is a rare player with his size, aggressiveness and offensive ability being a RHD. He’s also pretty raw still. That alone will move him up many boards, and nobody should be surprised if by draft day, he moves up the most, where Buium and Levshunov are seen as more finished products already, who won’t develop as much over the next 3-4 years.

We’ll see but think it’s safe to say Buium is a Top 20-25 pick, no matter how it shakes out. Whether he ends up Top 10, we’ll see. If I had to guess, I’d say 15th-18th overall.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

Drury and Laviolette Must Go
Dec 8, 2013
57,844
23,807
New York
I can’t see him going any lower than top 15. He’s scoring too much. Good chance he’ll be top 10, and he’ll have a chance for top 5.
 

kyle44

Registered User
Jan 7, 2007
937
1,018
I can’t see him going any lower than top 15. He’s scoring too much. Good chance he’ll be top 10, and he’ll have a chance for top 5.

He certainly looked top 5-10 to me at the WJC. He was one of the more impressive draft eligible d-men I can recall at this tournament, particularly from an offensive perspective. He was every bit as good, if not better, than Jamie Drysdale at this tournament in his draft year. I realize Drysdale was a "true" 17 year old at the time, but Buium only turned 18 a few weeks before the tournament. Very bright future ahead for this kid.
 

Hanji

Registered User
Oct 14, 2009
3,165
2,660
Wisconsin
Top 15 for me. Noticed some issues against a heavy forecheck, but he's young: all of Denver's d-core seems to have the same problem.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad