Coaches Coroner
Member
- Mar 12, 2009
- 7,395
- 7,518
as is the case for 90% of that draft and all drafts
Your percentage is a bit high.
as is the case for 90% of that draft and all drafts
Growing the game fine. Making a mockery of the draft for marketing purposes, no, they deserve to be made fun of.Th Isles have a strong presence known China.
A lot of this has to do with their former owner.
They did a ton of work growing the game over there.
Say what you will, anyone that tries to grow the game of hockey deserves some praise.
Growing the game fine. Making a mockery of the draft for marketing purposes, no, they deserve to be made fun of.
Growing the game fine. Making a mockery of the draft for marketing purposes, no, they deserve to be made fun of.
The only beef I would have with the pick as an Islanders fan is they had a 7th round pick so why use a 6th rounder on him. At worst why not just trade that 6th rounder for 2 7th rounders
They had a 7th (used on Peter Hansson)
There's a cap, trading a pick to dump a contract to pursue a player to improve your team on-ice is fine. Using a pick for marketing value is ridiculous and worthy of being mocked.Do teams make a mockery of the draft when they've included picks in trades in order to acquire something of value that wasn't necessarily a drafted prospect?
Whether that has been straight up cash when it was allowed, whether it has been attaching a pick with a bad contract to get out of that contract, or whether it has been in exchange for a rental who'll only be on the team for the playoffs?
The Islanders "sold" a 6th round pick for x amount of dollars worth of marketing value in China. How much would the equivalent amount of marketing exposure cost them to accomplish in China if they paid for it? How is this any more of a mockery than attaching a pick to a bad contract to clear money? A pick is an asset, they used it to gain something.
There's a cap, trading a pick to dump a contract to pursue a player to improve your team on-ice is fine. Using a pick for marketing value is ridiculous and worthy of being mocked.
0 points in 37 USHL games
stud
There's a cap, trading a pick to dump a contract to pursue a player to improve your team on-ice is fine. Using a pick for marketing value is ridiculous and worthy of being mocked.
He's still no Vivek Ranadive. Trying to give NBA lifers advice to use a cherry picking strategy because it worked with his daughters 10 year old team.Definitely worthy of being mocked, as are most things in life...but this is the same owner who:
- wanted to fire all of his scouts and rely on rankings
- wanted to put sumo wrestlers in goal
- insisted on signing Yashin and DiPietro to two of the verifiably worst contracts in NHL history
- wanted to give Peca a 10 year deal
etc
I don't think he cares about the consensus opinion and why should he with the path of his life? He is unconventional...using credit cards for startup capital he founded the second software company to ever surpass 1bn in sales. This kind of stuff happens when rich guys venture into new hobbies
It's disappointing because unlike Jeremy Lin, Andong Song is such a classy and modest person, not some stuck up p****. He would do wonders for Chinese culture and expanding hockey if Song was a star.
Hey hey, not at all a Lin fan but that's a little unfair.It's disappointing because unlike Jeremy Lin, Andong Song is such a classy and modest person, not some stuck up p****. He would do wonders for Chinese culture and expanding hockey if Song was a star.
savageGood to hear that his incredible hockey success hasn't inflated his ego.