dedalus
Registered User
From today's Post:
This is the same Larry Brooks who wrote less than a month ago: "This is also the time for all of us to lower our voices, myself included .... Each of us has an obligation to stop dragging it — and each other — through the mud .... We have to stop trying to destroy one another. We have to stop with the name-calling and the character-assassination."
One has to wonder if Larry considers his credibility when in one article he calls for an end to name-calling and character-assassination, but in an article less than a month removed from the first he tosses off the terms "myopic" and "small-minded."
As always, well done, Mr. Brooks!
What would the league be afraid of, that Crosby wouldn't choose to assign himself to a small-market outpost such as Columbus, Pittsburgh or Edmonton for the first 12 years of his career? Heavens. Wasn't shutting down for a full season, isn't insisting on a restrictive hard cap, aren't these drastic enough measures to satisfy the apparently insatiable appetite of the small markets and their league enablers?
Somehow, it appears as if adopting a lottery weighted by aggregate records over the last four seasons is gaining favor among league personnel. Well, of course. Why not? Why wouldn't these myopic, small-minded people want to embrace a system that would award Columbus the most desirable spot in the lottery?
This is the same Larry Brooks who wrote less than a month ago: "This is also the time for all of us to lower our voices, myself included .... Each of us has an obligation to stop dragging it — and each other — through the mud .... We have to stop trying to destroy one another. We have to stop with the name-calling and the character-assassination."
One has to wonder if Larry considers his credibility when in one article he calls for an end to name-calling and character-assassination, but in an article less than a month removed from the first he tosses off the terms "myopic" and "small-minded."
As always, well done, Mr. Brooks!