Dead Meat
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2004
- 581
- 717
Nice win but they're still terrible.
That's the goal here - a top three pick
Nice win but they're still terrible.
Did you ask any of em if they booked their 1st round exit tee times yet?It really brings a smile to my face to see the Leafs lose. Even better to see the sullen faces leaving the UC.
I did not.Did you ask any of em if they booked their 1st round exit tee times yet?
He’s got good defensive metrics and all but despite being a big guy he’s not a “little things” sort of player and is often invisible when not scoring.I have to be 100% honest. A lot of the games I watch Matthews, he is so hit or miss. Some nights he's great some nights he's absolutely invisible. I thought he was mostly terrible this game.
Damn, how many games does it take to get promoted to head equipment manager?
1501Damn, how many games does it take to get promoted to head equipment manager?
Podcast has always been enjoyable for me. Happy they are having success with their new networkHaven't watched Dangle in a few years. Might have to make an exception.
So you haveFrosts’ value at less than a mid/late 2nd?No. But I would move the 24 Van 2nd and maybe a 5th 2025 for Frost and a 4th 2024.
You can't just build only through the draft. We already have a ridiculous amount of picks. At some point you do need players that can play.
I'm not saying to blow up the plan. I think acquiring the right guy who fits the timeline isn't blowing up your plan.
He likely has more value than that but the discussion was more about adding players that can help you in roles they are better than, rather than trying to decide his value.So you haveFrosts’ value at less than a mid/late 2nd?