Speculation: LA Kings News, Rumors, Roster Thread 2022-23 Season Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Schrute farms

LA Kings: new GM wanted -- inquire within
Jul 7, 2020
2,266
3,993
I have much more of an issue with HOW (checking, no PP, limited minutes, etc.) the prospects have been utilized by the FO versus WHERE they have played (league).
 

KINGS17

Smartest in the Room
Apr 6, 2006
32,381
11,266
I'm not really sure I agree with the first part. If you go back and reference the QB and Turcotte threads when both were sent to Ontario the response was overwhelmingly positive. The same was true with Bjornfot and Kupari. Even as recently as the end of last season with Helenius. And that was after it brazen apparent the hyper-aggressive AHL usage wasn’t working.

As you know, I am not one to subscribe to the "MMQB" or "Hindsight is 20/20" stuff that Axl and others always say when people are critical of Blake, because for a lot of his decisions as GM there was significant criticism at the time the moves were made. But when it came to the insane AHL usage and poor development choices on those guys it really is MMQB'ing to be critical of it, because at the time almost no one was.
Everyone was hoping to something similar to the Voynov-plan. Play a teenager in the AHL until he is dominant, then trade an exising player off the NHL roster to make room for a 21-year old that is NHL ready.
 

NikF

Registered User
Sep 24, 2006
3,011
485
You can spin this any way you want and look at it from a million angles, as some have been saying for a while, competing ans rebuilding at the same time just isn't an ideal plan since they will neither manage to properly rebuild nor win anything. Every other decision stems from this failure of a plan. The reason why players aren't getting proper development, why their roles are blocked by veterans with multi year deals, why their value is plummeting while they're sitting in limbo. All of that is just a consequence of their plan at the top.

If they get bounced in the first round, best case scenario for Kings fans would be a new management group overseeing the next cycle based around Byfield-Clarke. It would be a tough pill to swallow since you'd have to say goodbye to a number of players, even the Fiala addition would feel almost pointless in that case. But I doubt anyone at the top of the organizational structure has the balls to do that. Luc certainly won't do it and so you will see Blake for years longer churning out a 1-2nd round playoff pretender.

Presumably rebuilding was part of the plan as well. I don't know how they can do an internal review at the end of the year and give themselves a positive rating in that regard. None of their top picks are performing or are performing out of the position they were drafted at. The number of established core players who are young is low given the size and and quality of their prospect pool and the value as assets is going to start to plummet on a number of them. How do you walk away from that and give yourself a positive rating?
 

lumbergh

It was an idea. I didn't say it was a good idea.
Jan 8, 2007
6,346
5,604
Richmond, VA
I Think Kupari can be the guy you are looking for. He's blazing fast and big, he just needs to play with more grit which I've seen signs of. The European players who grow up on the bigger rink take some time to learn how to deliver a big check without taking themselves out of the play. Rasmus is almost there. I hate that TM has so little trust in him- he clearly has more talent than Lizotte yet is never given the ice time he needs to gain confidence.

We are speaking as if the season is over. There still is another game and another one after that if we win. The Oilers are not invincible and are pretty meh after McDavid, Draisaitl and Bouchard. They are not going to win the Cup as currently constructed. Having said that, there needs to be some serious organizational soul searching if we don't advance. I'm with Bland here, if we stay the course this team is headed for the Black hole.
I like Kupari as a 4th line checking forward, but just hasn't been able to show any ability to control the game from the center position. Two almost full seasons now in the NHL and he's shown no signs of breaking out. It's not just a confidence thing, in my opinion. It's a hockey sense problem.

He'll be fine as a forechecker and a defensive center, but I don't see him making any difference at the NHL level. Just there, pretty invisible. Maybe if he learned to pester and fight he'd add a new dimension to his game. No sign of that happening either.
 

Piston

Fire Luc and Blake
Jun 14, 2006
874
1,039
Santa Monica/Salt Lake
I like Kupari as a 4th line checking forward, but just hasn't been able to show any ability to control the game from the center position. Two almost full seasons now in the NHL and he's shown no signs of breaking out. It's not just a confidence thing, in my opinion. It's a hockey sense problem.

He'll be fine as a forechecker and a defensive center, but I don't see him making any difference at the NHL level. Just there, pretty invisible. Maybe if he learned to pester and fight he'd add a new dimension to his game. No sign of that happening either.

I don't agree- I think like too many of our prospects, he has not been put in a position to succeed. He is already and excellent PK player and his positioning on defense is quite good. Let's give him better wingers before writing him off as offensively limited.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kinghock

Raccoon Jesus

Todd McLellan is an inside agent
Oct 30, 2008
62,037
62,254
I.E.
The read on Kupari in his draft year was good skills, questionable game sense.

Would add he wasn't great at using his teammates and stickhandled himself into trouble, and those have both manifested a bit at the NHL level too

But I'm glad he's picked up his checking because that will be his calling card to establishing enough NHL time to maybe do more

Nothing wrong with being a Finnish Trevor Lewis
 

ZJames

Registered User
Jan 4, 2011
923
537
Dont worry about it
You can spin this any way you want and look at it from a million angles, as some have been saying for a while, competing ans rebuilding at the same time just isn't an ideal plan since they will neither manage to properly rebuild nor win anything. Every other decision stems from this failure of a plan. The reason why players aren't getting proper development, why their roles are blocked by veterans with multi year deals, why their value is plummeting while they're sitting in limbo. All of that is just a consequence of their plan at the top.

If they get bounced in the first round, best case scenario for Kings fans would be a new management group overseeing the next cycle based around Byfield-Clarke. It would be a tough pill to swallow since you'd have to say goodbye to a number of players, even the Fiala addition would feel almost pointless in that case. But I doubt anyone at the top of the organizational structure has the balls to do that. Luc certainly won't do it and so you will see Blake for years longer churning out a 1-2nd round playoff pretender.

Presumably rebuilding was part of the plan as well. I don't know how they can do an internal review at the end of the year and give themselves a positive rating in that regard. None of their top picks are performing or are performing out of the position they were drafted at. The number of established core players who are young is low given the size and and quality of their prospect pool and the value as assets is going to start to plummet on a number of them. How do you walk away from that and give yourself a positive rating?
I wouldn't expect a full rebuild until Kopitar either leaves or retires. I think we should prepare for another 2-3 years of being a black hole team, unless QB, Kaliyev, and Clarke really explode into high end players in the next year. And if we get a new coach. Big IF. I can't see Blake firing his old buddy Todd unless he (Blake) was facing imminent termination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schrute farms

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,365
10,541
Would add he wasn't great at using his teammates and stickhandled himself into trouble, and those have both manifested a bit at the NHL level too

But I'm glad he's picked up his checking because that will be his calling card to establishing enough NHL time to maybe do more

Nothing wrong with being a Finnish Trevor Lewis
Sure, but he has a LONG way to go to reach Lewis' level.

Trevor Lewis was dependable right out of the gate. Kupari still looks like an unremarkable offensive player cast into the role of checking center. His speed obscures a lot of inadequacies. I have never been a fan and still think his best usage is as a third tier scoring winger, like a Mike Donnelly type. Dime a dozen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Lunch

RocketKing

Registered User
Jul 2, 2017
925
812
The read on Kupari in his draft year was good skills, questionable game sense.
Kupari isn’t good enough with what he brings offensively to make the top 6 or even top 9, and he’s not smart enough to use what he does have to be a defensive asset in the bottom lines. IMO it’s all about the lack of smarts. If we could get a 2nd or a 3rd we should take it. He’s not going to help us win anything.
 

GameNight

Registered User
Dec 5, 2021
232
266
one of the paths to success for signing the various UFAs and RFAs will be getting Vilardi to agree to do what Mikey did. Here's a 7 yr deal Gabe, but do this 1 yr deal for us first
 

Raccoon Jesus

Todd McLellan is an inside agent
Oct 30, 2008
62,037
62,254
I.E.
Sure, but he has a LONG way to go to reach Lewis' level.

Trevor Lewis was dependable right out of the gate. Kupari still looks like an unremarkable offensive player cast into the role of checking center. His speed obscures a lot of inadequacies. I have never been a fan and still think his best usage is as a third tier scoring winger, like a Mike Donnelly type. Dime a dozen.

"out the gate" at age 24, though, and Kupari has been more productive thus far in spite of role.

I'm not going to bat for Kupari by any means, I just think he's accepted his role a bit and is genuinely trying to be that guy.
 

Telos

In Gavrikov We Must Trust
Aug 16, 2008
32,724
7,394
Reno, NV
Not really excited about drastic line changes as I would be with drastic system changes. Understandably, that is hard to pull off in a few days during the playoffs; however, every player is a professional that has likely played or knows most systems under the sun and can adapt to them. I would rather they make changes, be less exploitable by Edmonton, and really put an emphasis on special teams. If everything is played the exact same way with just a mix-up of lines, they are just letting Edmonton continue to do what they do best and are hoping for the luck of the bounces.
 

bmr

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
1,872
1,683
That's actually what i would guess offensively.
I think you gotta keep Iafallo on the top line. He looked good there. Keep Moore/Danault/Arvidsson together and i'm good with 22/55/13. Lizzo with Kupari and Kaliyev/Grundstrom. More balanced. Durzi is still gonna play (sigh).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad