Sting
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2004
- 7,918
- 2,919
The record might not be that different, but from a development standpoint, the message coming from Martin is a lot better in my opinion.We are 17-24-3 with Jacques Martin.
11-15 with DJ Smith.
The record might not be that different, but from a development standpoint, the message coming from Martin is a lot better in my opinion.We are 17-24-3 with Jacques Martin.
11-15 with DJ Smith.
We are a bad teamWe are 17-24-3 with Jacques Martin.
11-15 with DJ Smith.
The record might not be that different, but from a development standpoint, the message coming from Martin is a lot better in my opinion.
Mathematically, no, but we were already 8 or 9 points back from where we needed to be to make the playoffs, we'd have had to play at a 106 pts pace to finish the season and hit 94-95 pts so play like a top 10 team in the league. Historically a very uncommon thing to do at that stage.Was the entire season already lost?
When DJS was let go there were 57 games left for the Senators to play. And they were about 12 points out of a playoff spot, with anywhere between 4 or 6 games in hand on the teams in the wildcard spots, or teams just a point out of a spot.
I suggest that with right decision the Senators could have at the least, be competing for a wildcard spot today, if the season wasn’t written off in managements and apparently it seems J Martins’ mind, if I’m hearing you right?
Did I believe making the playoffs were achievable, back in December, when DJS was fired?
No I did not, as the odds were not on the Senators side, but I sure thought they could at least be much closer today, than they are…. If they had hired someone like Berube.
Standing on December 19th
View attachment 841248
EDM this year dumped Campbell and his .879 sv% to help spur their run.
50% retention for 4 years, which would presumably be required, plus the cost to dump the remainder, isn't nothing either though.buy out makes zero sense for Korpi
trade him with retention and you only suffer the cap hit for 4 years
I am sure you can trade him for 1.3-1.5mill retained which means his cap hit would be 2.5-2.7mill for a 1b or backup goalie50% retention for 4 years, which would presumably be required, plus the cost to dump the remainder, isn't nothing either though.
That's not something I can believe to be true, especially with 4 years of that left, but fair response.I am sure you can trade him for 1.3-1.5mill retained which means his cap hit would be 2.5-2.7mill for a 1b or backup goalie
50% retention for 4 years, which would presumably be required, plus the cost to dump the remainder, isn't nothing either though.
buy out makes zero sense for Korpi
trade him with retention and you only suffer the cap hit for 4 years
That roster doesn’t scream “playoffs” to me.
you can only get ~1.15 m in cap relief by waiving a player, if their cap hit exceeds that amount the portion above stays with the team as dead cap.Put him in the minors and make him the 3rd goalie - no cap hit
you can only get ~1.15 m in cap relief by waiving a player, if their cap hit exceeds that amount the portion above stays with the team as dead cap.
I'll be surprised if that's the case, but certainly could be wrong. I guess I just don't see any market for what amounts to basically the league worst tender with a decent amount of games played.Actually, Korpisalo at 2.0 AAV might not be seen as bad option for some teams, might not cost anything to dump the remaining part.
Or would we be comfortable to have him as our backup at 2.0 AAV if we had a relateively solid starter? Problem is term, Sogaard (and/or Merilainen need a path)
Thinking the same.Korpy isn’t going anywhere next year, he’s here for another year, and then a decision will be made, depending how he does.
I think Forsberg will be gone though.
Korpisalo’s $2 m plus White’s $875 k to 2026-27 is something ($2.875 m) though. Next year we get a $625 k credit though.Actually, Korpisalo at 2.0 AAV might not be seen as bad option for some teams, might not cost anything to dump the remaining part.
Or would we be comfortable to have him as our backup at 2.0 AAV if we had a relateively solid starter? Problem is term, Sogaard (and/or Merilainen need a path)
Weren't you awhile back regularly commenting on how much better we've been since the coaching change?Wanted to add that we have 4 guys in the Top-70 in ES forwards scoring
Stutzle 17th
Tkachuk 36th
Giroux 44th
Batherson 69th
The "average team" would have 4 guys in the Top-128
Even Joseph is 99th (Tarasenko was also in the Top-100 before being traded). Pinto has 16 of his 21 Pts at ES (in 29 GP), him and/or Greig could replace Tarasenko's production easily and compensate if Giroux ES production declines.
If coaching, goaltending and the PP weren't such huge problems this season, we'd be seen as a much better team, without the proposed improvements (clone a Joseph, a Zub and fix the goaltending and coaching)
Fixing the coaching, goaltending and PP would be my 3 priorities
Weren't you awhile back regularly commenting on how much better we've been since the coaching change?
The Goals Against and PP are both worse since the coaching change. They weren't good before but they've gotten worse.
Part of the problem is we give up a ton of low chance shots and our goalies are terrible at stopping the easy shot.
Part of the problem is we give up a ton of low chance shots and our goalies are terrible at stopping the easy shot.
While there is a concern I think a lot of GM will look one year and see the resume of a player. Especially a player coming from this team.I'll be surprised if that's the case, but certainly could be wrong. I guess I just don't see any market for what amounts to basically the league worst tender with a decent amount of games played.
I'm not comfortable, nor optimistic, but I've been wrong before. I'm still scratching my head how he ever got this contract in the first place. His career does not support it imo.