Unbiased Fan
Registered User
- May 24, 2019
- 3,644
- 1,619
It’s not his fault this team without PP. It’s not his fault our best centers are 3C in contenders at best.what's a "true" Flyers these days anyway? A 65 point player who plays with an attitude? Silly. Trade TK while they still can because he ain't worth what he's askin for. There are defensemen scoring nearly 100 points in today's game for cryin out loud...
Don’t really think he pushes the Wild into that next tier of teams, so I don’t want him, but the most I’d do is prob Marat/Ohgren+2nd+Peart/Lambos. And I’d want an extension.
my Gosh dude stop being a bait / troll and trying to get laughs. To put Brock Faber, wallstedt, & 1st for Travis Minnesota doesn’t need. Michk alone doesn’t even get wallstedt or especially faber. Your proposals are always a bait regarding wild players. Your a hater and not unbiasedMichkov and Konechny for Faber, Wallstedt and a 1st
Faber is an obvious no go. He’s our #1 dman at 21 years old. That being said, I would be open to a lot of pieces for Michkov. Pretty sure the only immediate no-gos for Michkov would be Kaprizov or Faber.Michkov and Konechny for Faber, Wallstedt and a 1st
Michkov is the future of the franchise flyers aren't entertaining offers that include faber let alone ones that don'tFaber is an obvious no go. He’s our #1 dman at 21 years old. That being said, I would be open to a lot of pieces for Michkov. Pretty sure the only immediate no-gos for Michkov would be Kaprizov or Faber.
I mean, I dropped it after it was said that Yurov had to be included.Michkov is the future of the franchise flyers aren't entertaining offers that include faber let alone ones that don't
Let's keep the focus on konecny
I can understand that but I don’t think I’d move Michkov without Faber. I’m a vacuum once Michkov signs his ELC I think they’re very close in value.Faber is an obvious no go. He’s our #1 dman at 21 years old. That being said, I would be open to a lot of pieces for Michkov. Pretty sure the only immediate no-gos for Michkov would be Kaprizov or Faber.
Totally understandable. Michkov is going to be a very good player.I can understand that but I don’t think I’d move Michkov without Faber. I’m a vacuum once Michkov signs his ELC I think they’re very close in value.
To get bigger, and more consistent scoring down the middle. So it would be for another B before winger. They won’t trade him for worse player, or smaller playerWhy is their talk around moving Rossi?
Russo mentioned they were in on Gauthier with Rossi+ as the offer. So I imagine it would be something like that if he is traded.Why is their talk around moving Rossi?
Wait this happened during the trade deadline??Russo mentioned they were in on Gauthier with Rossi+ as the offer. So I imagine it would be something like that if he is traded.
He just said that is the type of deal they would be looking for. It’s in his mailbag article.Wait this happened during the trade deadline??
Would he be considered in a konecny deal ?To get bigger, and more consistent scoring down the middle. So it would be for another B before winger. They won’t trade him for worse player, or smaller player