WesternEliteHockeyPr
Registered User
He now has 141 pts in 57 games. Should go in the top 3 I think with numbers like that!
He now has 141 pts in 57 games. Should go in the top 3 I think with numbers like that!
Maybe Gillies would have around 120 pts then on London. Kind of puts everything into perspective I guess. Thing is, Hunter plays all his key guys in key situations each and every year and each and every year new guys light up the league on that team.
I was at the game and wow, what a performance. I know the 7 points were against the last place team but every time he touched the puck it ended up in the back of the net. And its been that way for most of the season, in particular after the world jrs.
At the beginning of the year I was asking myself, is he better than Schremp as he reminded me a lot of him... then after 3 or 4 games I realized he is Schremp but with speed and better defensively!
I am just reallllllly hoping he comes back to London next year. At 160lbs I think he should be back but you never know.
I'm not trying to take anything away from his skill - he's amazing. But his stats are higher than they'd be if he were playing with another team or coach.
Kane has been an excellent scorer everywhere he's played, though, people should remember that.
Certainly there is some truth to what you say, though. If Kane were on a middle of the pack team like, say, Kitchener, his numbers would certainly be a bit less.
I know off topic but how was Kost?I was at the game and wow, what a performance. I know the 7 points were against the last place team but every time he touched the puck it ended up in the back of the net. And its been that way for most of the season, in particular after the world jrs.
At the beginning of the year I was asking myself, is he better than Schremp as he reminded me a lot of him... then after 3 or 4 games I realized he is Schremp but with speed and better defensively!
I am just reallllllly hoping he comes back to London next year. At 160lbs I think he should be back but you never know.
7 point game or no, he ought to go #1. He's proven himself at every level.
Maybe Gillies would have around 120 pts then on London. Kind of puts everything into perspective I guess. Thing is, Hunter plays all his key guys in key situations each and every year and each and every year new guys light up the league on that team.
Haha.
In his draft year, Kane is putting up numbers equal to what Schremp did in his senior year. Huge production at Kane's age means ALOT more than huge production in their final year.Racking up points in Junior is not always a great barometer for judging prospects. Look at Schremp. Virtually unstoppable at Junior level. But has had his struggles as a pro.
How would people, who see him on a continual basis, rate Kane in his own end?
In his draft year, Kane is putting up numbers equal to what Schremp did in his senior year. Huge production at Kane's age means ALOT more than huge production in their final year.
He hasnt proven himself at every level...he hasnt scored a single point in the NHL or AHL.7 point game or no, he ought to go #1. He's proven himself at every level.