Here's what I've noticed:
For staters no report has mentioned anything about spermicide residue or any "residue" of a foreign object.
Therefore it's still possible that Kane did rape her either using a Coney Island Whitefish or some foreign object.
Also, this doesn't necessarily mean that he can't be guilty of a lesser charge, but it's pure speculation at this point. Even the "witness claims" seem to be tainted by the clickbait TMZ media". Ergo, was it "definitive rape" as she claimed it, or typical meda grandstanding?
As for the DNA on her shoulders and underneather her fingernails? Again, nothing their
proves sexual misconduct/assault of any degree. Hell, our last anniversary trip I had my wife's DNA on my shoulder, bite marks, her DNA under my fingernails, amongst other things that are too TMI for this forum, but the only thing it showed was that we had an awesome anniversary.
.
Thus, with he lastest *factual* news about the story, it may make the changes that Kane's guilty of rape in the 1st less, but it's not putting the issue to bed yet, and even after that you're still going to have people blithering about him.