Gallagher at 22 wasn't the player Yamamoto is.You trying to compare Yamamoto to Gallagher is too funny.
Imagine calling a 50 point 2nd line winger with 70 point potential "negative value" at 5.5 x 6 @ 25 years old.
The graph you showed is just a drawing unless you add more info. Sample info, method, margin error at least.
Remember when Tolvanen was the steal of the draft? Not going to lie, I was mad when Flyers took Frost over him, good thing I'm not a GM.
Technically he has 200 point potential. Doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. He’s been the same lazy floating highly skilled player his whole life. He just can’t get away with it as much anymore. He speaks french though so that counts as bonus points for some teams/ fans
It not hard to look into.
At 26 that potential to reach 70 points is now called fluke or a statistical anomaly or extremely unlikely to happen.
You trying to compare Yamamoto to Gallagher is too funny.
There are many players in that category. Some who make a lot more money than Drouin.
Agreed, but that doesn’t make it a good thing, right? Drouin is built great for hockey. He’s got that lower big body and near 200 pounds. He’s got great skills. If he was a little guy, I could understand not being harder to play against. But he’s heavier, so if he committed to a 200 foot game (without the puck) he would be so much better. He’s a guy (I guess) we always just expect more from, because he is so talented.
I’m thinking a drouin nurse base would be something. Add gotta be on drouin . Say drouin and lehkonen for nurse and ??? Something that gives a slight edge cap wise to Edmonton .
And Chiarot in the AHL? lol not happening.
Too lazy, doesn’t care, always had attitude issues. Par for the course at this point.
Sorry I have a buzz on . Forgot all about chariot. Unbelievable.. even better .
Not much but he produces points at a top 6 pace, he's certainly not negative value.
