Anyways, back on topic
I reviewed Johnny's Freshman year, some interesting splits.
First 27 games: 19 points
Final 17 games: 26 points
(Interestingly enough, the
USCHO stats page for him has him at 44GP 21G 24A 45P, where as hockeydb has him with 1 less assist (44GP 21G 23A 44P))
Anyways, got me thinking on his seasonal patterns. Check out the below:
Outside of his Junior Year (where he had a very hot start and then cooled off and went the the WJC), he has shown a fairly consistent pattern of improving over the course of a season, especially after the half way point of the season. His rookie NHL season fits this trend. Wouldn't be shocked to see his 2nd and 3rd year NHL trends to mirror that of his NCAA years (at a discounted growth rate ofcourse, to normalize for development). I could see 15 -30% increase in his scoring rate next season, with a productivity ceiling another 10-15% higher.
If he stays on track for ~70 points this season, that would imply ~80-90+ point season next year, and a career ceiling of 105 points, staying between 85-100 points for the majority of his prime.
Obviously, this is not very scientific and there are no guarantees his productivity growth continues. But to me, it does seem reasonable based on his historical progression, as well as historical production growth rates of other generational IQ players (which I believe he possesses).
- Gretzky increased his scoring rate 25% his 2nd year (+ another 60% for his productivity ceiling)
- Crosby increased his scoring rate 20% his 2nd year (+ another 20% for his productivity ceiling). One thing to note here is that Crosby was much more physically developed then Gretzky & Lemieux at the same age.
- Lemieux increased his scoring rate 40% his 2nd year (+ another 60% for his productivity ceiling).
Obviously, these guys came in a few years younger than Johnny, so a lot of this improvement can be attributed to physical development. But a lot of it can be linked to "figuring out" the NHL, and being given more opportunities to drive their teams offense, both of which apply to Johnny's case. With that context, I think these projections look less and less crazy and more and more reasonable.