calder candidate
Registered User
Armia is probably still better than Pearson and Gallagher… Even when production isn’t there he still reliable and way harder to push off the puck…
I agree, but I think it's his lackluster effort that's the problem. Gally is washed and barely 4th line-level but maybe his leadership is seen as what puts him over the edge. He's respected in the org so it's not that easy to just ship him to Laval for the year and call it a day.Armia is probably still better than Pearson and Gallagher… Even when production isn’t there he still reliable and way harder to push off the puck…
They won't accrue, but they will get a lump some for both those moves.I checked out the page. Do you or anyone else know in the Habs specific case, does the club accrue space once the Armia/Xhekaj flip is/was done?
Once we flip Price and Dvorak, will we be able to accrue the difference?
Gallagher has a full no movement. Laval will never be an option for him.I agree, but I think it's his lackluster effort that's the problem. Gally is washed and barely 4th line-level but maybe his leadership is seen as what puts him over the edge. He's respected in the org so it's not that easy to just ship him to Laval for the year and call it a day.
Yes Bergevin and Molson were that dumb. Way to handcuff an organization for years to come.Gallagher has a full no movement. Laval will never be an option for him.
So, we have zero space ro start. We get:They won't accrue, but they will get a lump some for both those moves.
So around 300k for the Armia swap and 7M for the Price swap.
You only accrue when you are below the cap, and right now they are at cap space.
Yes but you mention two names who aren't really hot but I agree they still has a chance to pan out.Whether he can turn his career around or not, because of his age, he's not part of the future. So better to put him on waivers than Ylonen or Primeau, who at least have a chance of being a part of the future.
So, we have zero space ro start. We get:
0.321M for Armia-Xhekaj swap
6.050M for Price-Dvorak swap
0.890M when Primeau is waived to activate Dvo
0.762M by putting Wideman on LTIR until he can be waived
8.023M Total cap space "lump sum"
Now suppose we call up a 900k guy like Heineman for short term injury purposes and he stays for 1/10 of the season.
After we send him back down, do we still have 8.023M of space to add an 8.000 player?
Or did we lose 900k?
Or did we lose just 90k?
Secondly, when we add an 8.000M player with 25% of the season remaining, does he count for 2.000M on our cap or 8.000M?
According to a PuckPedia:
If a team is not in LTIR (under the cap), then all cap hits are pro-rated. When a player is traded, the new team takes on their cap hit pro-rated for the remaining days in the season. In the case of this season, they would be taking on the player's cap hit * (42 days / 185 days).
For LTIR teams however, cap hits are not pro-rated. So an LTIR team needs room in LTIR for the entire cap hit, with no pro-rating.
The team recuperates the cap hit at 100%. So if they had the room for a $8m player before, they have it again after sending the extra player down.Thanks you answered the second question. We need $8.000M of room to fit in the $8.000M player.
Any idea on the first question? We bring up Heineman for 18 days and then send him back down. While up, he counts 100% on the cap, ok got it. But after we send him back down, do we still have the room to take on an $8.000M player, or did we lose some due to the callup?
Forgot about that since it's so absurdGallagher has a full no movement. Laval will never be an option for him.
OK, so I understand that we do not accrue cap space, but it seems we also do not accrue cap usage. That's fair.The team recuperates the cap hit at 100%. So if they had the room for a $8m player before, they have it again after sending the extra player down.
Armia at practice in Laval this morning. On a line with Stephens and Farrell.
It's a nepotism move, is what youre saying. Gallys job is safe, not because he's a better player, but because he's more "respected" and has been here longer.I agree, but I think it's his lackluster effort that's the problem. Gally is washed and barely 4th line-level but maybe his leadership is seen as what puts him over the edge. He's respected in the org so it's not that easy to just ship him to Laval for the year and call it a day.
Bargain bin did a masterful job of anchoring us to that contract long term...It's a nepotism move, is what youre saying. Gallys job is safe, not because he's a better player, but because he's more "respected" and has been here longer.
Get this clown off my f***ing team.
Armia could do a lot of good in Laval if he goes in with the right attitude, being such a young team and all. I doubt he's the Alzner type personalitywise though.
No one is signing up for Gally's cap hit, unfortuntely.It's a nepotism move, is what youre saying. Gallys job is safe, not because he's a better player, but because he's more "respected" and has been here longer.
Get this clown off my f***ing team.
Gallagher is still on the team because he gives an honest effort and despite declining at a steep pace, he's still hard to play against in front of the net and is still fairly good defensively.It's a nepotism move, is what youre saying. Gallys job is safe, not because he's a better player, but because he's more "respected" and has been here longer.
Get this clown off my f***ing team.
Gallagher and Pearson are Canadian...they suck because they're worn down from years of hard battles.Armia is probably still better than Pearson and Gallagher… Even when production isn’t there he still reliable and way harder to push off the puck…
Gallagher is still on the team because he gives an honest effort and despite declining at a steep pace, he's still hard to play against in front of the net and is still fairly good defensively.
I really don't think effort is the issue with Armia as much as a very, very fragile confidence , is.If Armia gave an honest effort, he would probably still be on the club.
Im pretty sure you can actually waive a player even if he has a NMC. You would just have to pay out the contract. Contract termination also exist. (Btw look up nepotism)Bargain bin did a masterful job of anchoring us to that contract long term...
Can't waive him
Can't buy him out without ridiculous cost
Can't trade him without paying a big premium
That's why he's planted in the Habs NHL roster, has nothing to do with nepotism is preferential treatment imo
NMC prevents Gally from being waived / sent to the AHL. It does not prevent the team from buying him out though.Im pretty sure you can actually waive a player even if he has a NMC. You would just have to pay out the contract. Contract termination also exist. (Btw look up nepotism)
What a stupid contract lmao. Didn't know he had a NMC.NMC prevents Gally from being waived / sent to the AHL. It does not prevent the team from buying him out though.