Prospect Info: Jets Top Prospects Poll: #8 Prospect

Who is the Jets #8 Prospect?


  • Total voters
    108
  • Poll closed .

lomiller1

Registered User
Jan 13, 2015
6,409
2,967
Gustafsson is an easy choice here. Kovacevic is intriguing as well but at 22 there is very little wiggle room for him. If he isn’t a pretty good player right away there is no longer enough time for him to keep developing and become one.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,429
29,290
Gustafsson is an easy choice here. Kovacevic is intriguing as well but at 22 there is very little wiggle room for him. If he isn’t a pretty good player right away there is no longer enough time for him to keep developing and become one.

He is 22 - not 32. Or not even 24 like Poolman and Tanev were. Even at that, Tanev seemed to manage to improve. We're not sure about Poolman yet.
 

truck

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
10,992
1,583
www.arcticicehockey.com
He'll win here. 1 spot lower than where he belongs IMO. I can see the arguments for 2 spots higher, I just don’t agree with them.
I have him 2 spots higher...

Tiers IMO:
Gustafsson

Kovacevic
Chisholm
Berdin

Gawanke <- Really like his brain and puck skills, but his skating is a really really big question mark.
Vallati
Stanley
Spacek
 

Gil Fisher

Registered User
Mar 18, 2012
7,681
5,057
Winnipeg
It's weird that last year's underwhelming 2nd rounder is so highly thought of while this year's underwhelming 2nd rounder doesn't even bear meantion as a possible candidate.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
9,467
8,157
I'm the lone wolf who voted for Mc Kenzie. I realize that Kovacevic is probably next. Mc Kenzie is in my top 10 for sure. Like I said earlier, so much semblance to Gallagher, another Edmonton native. Add Lundmark.
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,174
70,509
Winnipeg
It's weird that last year's underwhelming 2nd rounder is so highly thought of while this year's underwhelming 2nd rounder doesn't even bear meantion as a possible candidate.

What is so underwhelming about him? He produced quite well for a 18 year old in a mens league. He also has a very polished defensive game. Seems like a solid young player to me that is developing just fine.
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,197
25,422
Five Hills
What is so underwhelming about him? He produced quite well for a 18 year old in a mens league. He also has a very polished defensive game. Seems like a solid young player to me that is developing just fine.

I think his ceiling is pretty low compared to some of the guys still left. Not that they all have high ceilings either at this point but I dont see Gus as being any better than a 3rd liner. And even that is still a long shot.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad