I'm fine with Mason playing the next game. Let's get some goalie competition happening.
I'm also fine with It, the team has only 2 games in the next 11 ish days or so. We need both guys going.
I'm fine with Mason playing the next game. Let's get some goalie competition happening.
Proving once again these charts mean very little. We won
If Kulikov misses games, would Poolman playing LHD be better than Chariot? I seem to recall some posters not being happy in preseason when Poolman played LHD.
Score effects play a role in these charts though. The two games prior to this one the Jets where controlling the shot clock until they got multi goal leads and then the other teams got the majority of the shots. Today was the one win where they didn't. I'm not worried as there has been a noticeable improvement in our play in our end. Once the team gets that down part they will start to dictate things more offensively imo.
The chart I posted is the score-adjusted Corsi. I agree about the score-effects so I mostly look at Score Adjusted Corsi. The Jets have been over 50% in SAC in only 1 game (the Oilers game) although they came close in the Canucks game.
To feel good about the Jets, (score adjusted) shot attempt wise I would have liked to see around a tie with the Oilers (which they did). Easily beat the Canucks, running closer to a double digit advantage (the jets only came close to tieing them) and kept the Canes shot advantage to like 5-6%, keep them from getting to double digits at the very least, instead they lost it by almost 18%.
Opponent | Quality Above Expected Corsi |
Leafs | -3.71 |
Flames | -11.32 |
Oilers | 2.18 |
Canucks | -3.72 |
Hurricanes | -7.47 |
Great, we won but unless we start to play a lot better we won't be saying that very often this year.
This discussion inspired me to think of way to quanitify "how much should a team should win/lose the shot attempt battle against another team" rather than me saying "It would have been better to win it against another team x% or lose to anohter team by just y%"
I don't know if this stat already exists or not but here's something that I'm calling "Quality Above Expected Corsi". This is similar to the Quality SV % but slightly different. If we look at the average (score adjusted) Corsi for each team from last season, then for each game they play against the Jets we can can come up with a number for "how much should the Jets win/lose the shot battle against that team in the game to be land around league average". In other words it gives us an idea of how far off the Jets were in that game from a league average team that played against their opponenent in the previous sesason.
Here's the table for the Jets so far:
If you are 0 or above then you are at par or above. So judging by above there has been only 1 game where the Jets Corsi For met or exceeded the average Corsi Against from last season of the team they were playing against.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Opponent Quality Above Expected Corsi Leafs -3.71 Flames -11.32 Oilers 2.18 Canucks -3.72 Hurricanes -7.47
This is not perfect ofcourse, teams have roster turnover, change coaches, systems change etc which makes their numbers from last season not as applicable but it should still give a rough idea (and this season's data can be used after teams have played ~25 games).
I don't think anyone thinks is this team has played great to start the year. Weve had some great individual performances but as a whole the team hasnt clicked very well yet. The positives are that the last three games has seen a much better focus on defense and we are starting to give up less quality chances (Step 1). On the flipside we haven't looked very good offensively (Likely due to the focus on defense). Given the talent on the team it's really only a matter of time before that comes around imo. I'm not satisfied with our play but the positives are that last year this team would have found ways to lose games like today and against Vancouver. There seems to be a new mentality and a level of maturity on this team so far this season. They aren't panicking as much.
They definitely will have to find some cohesion moving forward though.
Helle- really good
Ehlers- really good
Trouba-tough night
Laine- simply awful. His worst play maybe being losing that rim around the boards by Little in the last minute...and letting his man get by him. He was brutal.
And my fear is that they will look at the wins and decide to continue with more of the same. I am glad that the Jets have 6 points inspite of not playing great but the advantage of a 1-4 thumping to start the season would have been that Maurice would atleast have tried something else from what's not really working at the moment.
Laine looks a lot slower this season, his play on the PP has been awful whenever he handles the puck, kid has a pretty decent shot though!
Great, we won but unless we start to play a lot better we won't be saying that very often this year.
Any chance of starting up that thread again Gin? It was always one of my favorites.
Is it surprising? I am surprised there weren't more penalties taken by the Jets. Penalties tend to get taken when you are on your heals and stuck in your own zone for like a 60-70% of the game
When Maurice gets fired I'm going to call Chipman and cash in my favours to make you the next head coach!
I am at a loss to make sense of that reasoning.We've had, statistically speaking, above average goaltending the past 3 games. If they kept playkng like against Toronto and Calgary we'd be close to 0-5 since we're not scoring a ton and Mo would be on the hot seat. Makes sense to me.
Hmmm. Masons old team. Helle on fire.. Be hard not to start him but id suspect Maurice is dumb and will start Mason.