nhlfan79
Registered User
Atlanta would gladly take our Flames back. Most here miss them far more than the Thrashers.
NHL has been supporting Coyotes since their BK in what 2008 ? Support them for 10 more years doesn't seem like it bothers the league, otherwise Coyotes would have been relocated a while ago. And in 10 years well Seattle may officially have finished their renovations and be ready for NHL.
I think a third run at Atlanta is something Jacobs/Bettman wants to do before they retire.Atlanta would gladly take our Flames back. Most here miss them far more than the Thrashers.
I think a third run at Atlanta is something Jacobs/Bettman wants to do before they retire.
Unless that involves the NBA hawks owner as the owner of the NHLtea, It would be a poor decisions to try for the 3rd team a team in Atlanta.
You’re thinking about ASG. They’re long gone.
Except the new guys there not only don't have the interest, they go on to help rebuild the arena that an NHL team can't physically play there anymore.
Pretty much the opposite from the opportunity in Houston.
Except the new guys there not only don't have the interest, they go on to help rebuild the arena that an NHL team can't physically play there anymore.
Pretty much the opposite from the opportunity in Houston.
Is there more money to be gain in canada if the league add two more expansion team in canada today. I don't think there is. All you do is split the pie 2 more times and split the toronto fanbase. The NHL think there is more $$ to be gained in the US than it is in canada. Will the Canadian tv deal actually increase with a team in quebec and TOR 2? Eh i kinda doubt it.
What evidence do you have to suggest this? Do you think existing Leafs fans will switch to the new Southern Ontario team?It's already been explained to you that this is incorrect. Having a second Toronto team would not split the Toronto fanbase. We are talking about a top 5-7 revenue team in the NHL right out of the gate...all while the Leafs continue being a top 1-3 revenue team. But please continue being obstinate.
What evidence do you have to suggest this? Do you think existing Leafs fans will switch to the new Southern Ontario team?
By all means it won't be a failure, i don't think, but declaring them top 5-7 teams in terms of revenue right out of the gate seems rash.
Do you think everyone in Canada is a fan of a NHL team?What evidence do you have to suggest this? Do you think existing Leafs fans will switch to the new Southern Ontario team?
By all means it won't be a failure, i don't think, but declaring them top 5-7 teams in terms of revenue right out of the gate seems rash.
True.
But even if they reconfigured the arena it does not mean anything.
When Jerry Colangelo looked to build his arena in downtown Phoenix for his NBA Suns he wasn’t looking to own an NHL franchise either yet he checked with the league to see if they were interested in putting one there some day. The league said no (“not in his lifetime” was the quote) so he built it as a basketball only facility and then a few years later here comes the NHL looking for a favor.
That’s why I never count anything out with these things.
Unless that involves the NBA hawks owner as the owner of the NHLtea, It would be a poor decisions to try for the 3rd team a team in Atlanta.
You’re thinking about ASG. They’re long gone.
Except the new guys there not only don't have the interest, they go on to help rebuild the arena that an NHL team can't physically play there anymore.
Pretty much the opposite from the opportunity in Houston.
Very true on the history regarding Colangelo and the design.
Though I think how the NHL got there in the first place in part lead to the issues that exist to this day.
I think the NHL will want to make sure the ducks are much more aligned before going back
The NHL has not contacted Tony Ressler, so we don't know. And he wants a new arena, which will probably be hockey compatible. So TheLegend is right here, you never know.True.
But even if they reconfigured the arena it does not mean anything.
When Jerry Colangelo looked to build his arena in downtown Phoenix for his NBA Suns he wasn’t looking to own an NHL franchise either yet he checked with the league to see if they were interested in putting one there some day. The league said no (“not in his lifetime” was the quote) so he built it as a basketball only facility and then a few years later here comes the NHL looking for a favor.
That’s why I never count anything out with these things.
The NHL has not contacted Tony Ressler, so we don't know. And he wants a new arena, which will probably be hockey compatible. So TheLegend is right here, you never know.
Oh and the coyotes should go back to talking stick! Way better then glendale!
Well he had owned the hawks for all of 1 year, that's why. He's focusing and turning the team he owns now into a winner.The NHL started the 2015 expansion process after Resler took over the Hawks and the arena. He would have kept in the loop via other owners who have NHL ties (similar to Tannanbaum having close ties with Fertitta after he bought the Rockets) and still did not apply.
They pretty much have a new arena in Atlanta via the renovations that's being completed this year and not hockey compatible.
Unless a 2nd arena goes up Atlanta is decades away from being realistic.
and now there's a report that Georgia may be losing its hockey franchise after next season, despite the branding to Atlanta...The NHL started the 2015 expansion process after Resler took over the Hawks and the arena. He would have kept in the loop via other owners who have NHL ties (similar to Tannanbaum having close ties with Fertitta after he bought the Rockets) and still did not apply.
They pretty much have a new arena in Atlanta via the renovations that's being completed this year and not hockey compatible.
Unless a 2nd arena goes up Atlanta is decades away from being realistic.
Except the new guys there not only don't have the interest, they go on to help rebuild the arena that an NHL team can't physically play there anymore.
Pretty much the opposite from the opportunity in Houston.
Atlanta would gladly take our Flames back. Most here miss them far more than the Thrashers.
you do know why the name was selected originally, DBI always thought the Atlanta Flames had one of the best looking logos in the NHL. No offense to Calgary but the flaming 'C' does not compare to the original Atlanta logo.
Seattle will be the expansion team.
Calgary or Arizona will move to Houston, and honestly I think it’ll be Calgary due to their arena issues.
Pacific-
Anaheim
Arizona/Calgary
Edmonton
Los Angeles
San Jose
Seattle
Vancouver
Vegas
Central-
Chicago
Colorado
Dallas
Houston
Minnesota
Nashville
St. Louis
Winnipeg
and Coyotes don't have arena issues?