lol you are funny too. Lets focus on minute details of language as to prove a point i guess when that's clearly not what we are here to do. I was asking a rehtorical question about his skating- Obviously his skating was cited as one of his strengths and was not something that needed to be worked on. If that was a stick handling drill - I appreciate you pointing that out lol my mistake.
Umm... did you watch that video and thought it was a skating drill? The guy Virtanen is training with markets himself as a stickhandling specialist. The poster who posted the video talked about stick angles. Rhetorical question or not, can you not see how your question makes no sense in the context of what is being discussed?
And to take this further - I then asked if his stick handling was a "major weakness" that is a vast difference from if he needs to improve it lol. A case could be made everyone needs to improve at everything - but not everything is a major weakness of a player. Did you not read what I wrote? It works both ways?
So you expect posters here to answer what you call your rhetorical questions with a yes or no answer here on hfboards?
But sure, there is a difference. I don't think his stick handling is a "major weakness." I think its something he should improve on especially his ability to make plays down low.
And actually I didn't realize your post was more speaking solely about Ferraro's statement of his work back in Utica as it was in response to someone talking about this video. But you did clearly mention it. So you were citing some info about Virtanen from over a year ago when he played in Utica? That wasn't even last season lol. Then you brought up Horvats skating coach (again similar to this video). Then you referenced people wondering if he was fat all summer. You seemed to be all over the place your self a bit? Then you finish your post with "sounds like he is working hard". There is a recent video posted above and you are going to say "sounds like he is working hard" about something he did 1.5 years ago? Great lol - now that's funny.
Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension and ability to follow the discussion. The post you quoted me started off with me saying "It's all about context." Then I listed the context which was Ferraro saying that Virtanen put a lot of work in after hours in Utica. Prior to that (and more immediately after the posting of the video) I agreed with Pastor of Muppetz posts that in the last two years Virtanen has demonstrated that he's committed to improving his craft.
I feel the discussion was logical all along until you decided to post. I take no issue if there is a specific point you are replying to in my post. I do that all the time. But that's not what you are doing. Again, I specifically said it's all about context and in the context of Virtanen having put in after hours work in Utica, among other things, that video supports the notion that Virtanen is working hard to improve his game.
Really don't know why this is so hard for you to understand.