TkachukMyAho
Registered User
- Apr 13, 2007
- 1,081
- 624
Walker, by a lot.
Walker: he's what you want in an X receiver. Ran faster at the combine than expected. Gets into the secondary fast and gets past coverage. Good catching radius and good hands, and wins contested catches. He's more of a one-trick-pony than people would expect, as he's basically a #2 type boundary receiver that will take coverage deep. But unlike Gabe Davis, who filled that role for the past two seasons, he's faster and has better hands. Walker bounced around a bunch of schools, so he's really raw, hasn't run a complete route tree, and needs a lot of refinement. If Beane can get back into the 3rd round, I'd look at Walker at 3 or 3-.
Coleman: a basketball player style receiver. Jumps well and has great hands. Will make highlight reel catches. He's not going to use quickness to separate, but catches balls like a forward on the interior of the lane of a basketball court: he's got someone right next to him, but he out-positions himself and uses his leaping and hands to win. Is that good enough in the NFL? These aren't bad traits, but I wouldn't take him on Day 1 or 2.
McConkey: For a while, I've compared Shakir to Diggs, which is part of the reason I thought Diggs would eventually be traded or released. McConkey is the same mold. Not huge but great hands and a very good route runner. Can play all receiver spots effectively. McConkey's timed speed is faster than Diggs or Shakir, so he could be even more of a deep threat. But does Beane want to spend a premium asset on a receiver like one he's already got in Shakir? I like McConkey, so that's a good question. He probably got a 1- to 2+ grade from most teams.
Franklin: has boundary skills without the boundary body. Fast and gets to a lot of deep balls. Impressive accelerations. Has a tough time against press coverage and has average hands. Might not be able to line up on the ball a lot, and might need to motion from inside to outside to free him up. I'm not at huge fan because he's got a lot of boundary receiver traits but a lot of boudnary receiver downside. I'd think about him at 60, but if it's between him and Worthy, I'm taking Worthy.
Worthy: sometimes a player is average at a lot but has one elite asset which vaults him into higher tiers. That's Worthy with his speed. He's not big, isn't going to win a lot of contested balls, doesn't really have the college production you'd like to see, and doesn't have elite hands. But he's got scary speed. He's got Hill-type of speed and explosiveness, and that could be enough for Beane to take him. He'd be in play at 60 if I were running the Bills.
And one extra, as I've been asked about him:
Rice: great hands and doesn't drop the football. High-points a lot of footballs and rarely lets balls into his pads. Won contested catches at the Senior Bowl. Long-strider with fantastic body control. Even though he didn't run particularly well at the combine, he gets past coverage, even when it's off coverage. Gets faster as he goes and with the ball in his hands. Average agility, which hinders his explosiveness, which translates into average separation. With that said, he gets open a lot. He's got the feet and body control to use technique more than actual timed quickness to separate, which will take time to develop. But in the NFL, there are a lot of contested catch situations because the coverage is so good. So you've got to either be able to separate by quickness, or have the hands to win footballs. Rice has the latter, and for me, he's probably got the best hands in the draft. He's a 3- player for me but he's going to be a lot better pro than what he showed in college.
Awesome stuff. Thanks for this contribution.