Is Keith going the way of... Hammer?

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
3,910
2,827
I think just the opposite is often true of these boards. People here see a player having a down year who is in his 30s and think, oh he is definitely past it.

Two years ago people were saying Hossa is completely done. The following year he bounced back in a huge way, to the point where his presence was sorely missed this year.

So it’s uncertain what Keith will bring to the team next year. He could have an amazing bounce back that surprises a lot of people here. Even if he did, I think there exists both a confirmation and a negativity bias that would prevent some people from realizing that he was playing at a high level again. Hossa’s bounce back was much more easy to measure objectively than any D man’s would be.

I actually think Seabrook looked quite a bit better this year than last. This is probably due to how he was utilized. Yet this year he was more criticized than ever.

All that said, I expect Keith will have a similar year next year. Perhaps it will be a bit better if the hawks are playing meaningful games.
 
Last edited:

b1e9a8r5s

Registered User
Feb 16, 2015
12,904
4,039
Chicago, IL
I think just the opposite is often true of these boards. People here see a player having a down year who is in his 30s and think, oh he is definitely past it.

I agree. I think it goes the other way too, assuming that younger players will automatically get better. Neither is a given.

That's not to say I expect to see Keith competiting for a Norris. I think those days are almost assuredly gone. But there's is a huge gap between top dman in the league and what he was this year. I think he rebounds a bit next year. Of course getting a better partner would go along way in that regard as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow

Callidusblackhawk

Registered User
Feb 15, 2012
3,959
3,770
Downers Grove, Illinois
I agree. I think it goes the other way too, assuming that younger players will automatically get better. Neither is a given.

That's not to say I expect to see Keith competiting for a Norris. I think those days are almost assuredly gone. But there's is a huge gap between top dman in the league and what he was this year. I think he rebounds a bit next year. Of course getting a better partner would go along way in that regard as well.
Better systems would help quite a bit as well. Hopefully Q can try some out next season.
 

Blackhawks

Registered User
Jul 25, 2007
5,679
1,137
You gotta love Keith, I believe he was the true irreplaceable player to win all 3 cups and without him no cups would have won, second comes Kane, Toews comes in a third and it’s a shame he has fallen so much at such a young age. Keith though I still have no complains and watch for him have an amazing season next year...
 

Pez68

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
18,518
25,504
Chicago, IL
So a Norris winning defenseman was saddled with a 6/7 almost the entire year, and looked like shit???? Who would have thought????

Keith is 35 years old and has played a ridiculous anount of minutes in the NHL and in international competitions. The mileage on his legs is ridiculous. Whenever I hear that “cyborg” crap or “he isn’t human” nonsense its almost like an excuse to point a finger at him for bad play and using his age cannot possibly be a factor. Its dumb and its not fair to Keith.

Newsflash, Keith is in fact human. He is an older player, has likely played the minutes in his career of someone in his 40’s. If anyone on this team deserves a pass and more understanding for a decline in play it’s Keith, a warrior who has given his absolute all to this organization.

In this day and age, I don't buy the mileage excuse for a minute. I'm 38, and in all honesty, the more I play....the better I feel.... "Mileage" in hockey is f***ing nonsense.
 

Blue Liner

Registered User
Dec 12, 2009
10,332
3,608
Chicago
So a Norris winning defenseman was saddled with a 6/7 almost the entire year, and looked like ****???? Who would have thought????



In this day and age, I don't buy the mileage excuse for a minute. I'm 38, and in all honesty, the more I play....the better I feel.... "Mileage" in hockey is ****ing nonsense.

In fairness, comparing men's league, even at an elite level, to the grind and pounding of NHL seasons doesn't really match up I don't think. Plus, as (I think?) you have pointed out in other threads, everyone's body is different and starts to break down at different times. Not everyone is Lidstrom or Chelios. Not a ton of 38 year olds playing in the league, let alone at peak form for their careers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LordKOTL

LordKOTL

Abuse of Officials
Aug 15, 2014
3,525
768
Pacific NW
In all accounts Keith should rebound from sucking hard this year, but to what degree? I doubt we see a Norris-calibre D-man again from him and even if he is utilized correctly we're still going to see an aging defenseman--kinda like how Hossa rebounded from 2015. His 2016 was good, but it still wasn't quite up to Vintage Hossa. However, unlike Keith this year Hoss was properly utilized to good effect in 2016.

If Q continues to use/abuse Keith like he did this past season, it's not going to be good. If Q refined his role to that which Keith is still good at, Keith should be fine.
 

hawksfan50

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
14,098
1,981
Keith and Seabs both say in their exit interviews with the press that they will use the summer to get back on the best shape so that they can play better next season...The problem is we head the same spiel from Toews last summer...how he would train differently etc...to rebound after 2 poor 58 point seasons...But look what he gave us this season...even worse ! SO you expect Keith and Seabs to rebound to effective impact? To rebound to Competence again?Merely from Sumner training harder? Seems to me the hunger want and Focus has to improve and training will not do that ...maybe sessions with a sports psychologist would help the compete juices flow back in to get them to play harder and sacrifice more to help our defense get back to at least some kind of even ....The days of +25 or greater in 5x5 would apoear long gone as an expectation from them no matter how hard they put bint summer training ..The hunger to defend as if their lives depended on it ...that would help a lot..but really ..can we expect such a magic pill that they "really want it:instead of been there ....done that ...as 3 time Cup Champs ..and with their minds just re-living the glory days while they play bin a fog with incompetent results?

AS for Toews. ..3 strikes and ...well you know..do not expect the star level guy he once was.


As for Saad ...you could make a case for his shooting % to get back over 11% from justv8% and he is still young enough not to use the age and so many wars excuse ..so we probably should expect at least Saad to rebound (we hope).

Even Kane needs to commit more than he did this season..Certainly not on a mission. ..dlacled off in 2nd half..defense and checking went MIA.. WE hope he gets the hunger again to star and to put more effort into his defensive assignments without the puck.


Look...it was a rotten year all around from our Core ..our vets who were paid the most ...With CC it was bad luck to get injured and lose him the 2nd half..But with the others. ..simply their own rotten play that doomed bus.

BACK TO KEITH...if he gets back to a 0 in +/- next season from his disastrous -29 this season,then that will be an enormous swing of positive impact for our team..HE should not be running our PP...2 goals ...no way any dman with just that and who fails the eye test on shots from thempiintv (too many blocked...too many unblocked that miss the net)
..no way we should have him running our PP..If Q does that for sure he will lose his job ...
 
Last edited:

Panzerspitze

Registered User
Mar 4, 2010
4,958
998
A longer offseason should help too. I mean, just look back at the previous three seasons... Besides, the "core" (except maybe Kane) needs time filling out all the paperwork AARP is flooding them with.
 

Blackhawks

Registered User
Jul 25, 2007
5,679
1,137
A longer offseason should help too. I mean, just look back at the previous three seasons... Besides, the "core" (except maybe Kane) needs time filling out all the paperwork AARP is flooding them with.

What on earth are you talking about? This team has bad 2 very long offseasons already and if you think one or two weeks will make that much of a difference you are kidding yourself...
 

Blackhawks

Registered User
Jul 25, 2007
5,679
1,137
Keith and Sean both say in their exit interviews with the press that they will use the summer to get back on the best shape so that they can play better next season...The problem is we head the same spiel from Toes last summer...how he would train differently etc...to rebound after 2 poor 58 point seasons...But look what he gave us this season...even worse ! SO you expect Keith and Sean to rebound to effective impact? To rebound to Competence again?Merely from Sumner training harder? Seems to me the hunger want and Focus has to improve and training will not do that ...maybe sessions with a sports psychologist would help the compete juices flow back in to get them to play harder and sacrifice more to help our defense get back to at least some kind of even ....The days of +25 or greater in 5x5 would apoear long gone as an expectation from them no matter how hard they put bint summer training ..The hunger to defend as if their lives depended on it ...that would help a lot..but really ..can we expect such a magic pill that they "really want it:instead of been there ....done that ...as 3 time Cup Champs ..and with their minds just re-living the glory days while they play bin a fog with incompetent results?

AS for Toes. ..3 strikes and ...well you know..do not expect the star level guy he once was.


As for Saad ...you could make a case for his shooting % to get back over 11% from justv8% and he is still young enough not to use the age and so many wars excuse ..so we probably should expect at least Saad to rebound (we hope).

Even Kane needs to commit more than he did this season..Certainly not on a mission. ..dlacled off in 2nd half..defense and checking went MIA.. WE hope he gets the hunger again to star and to put more effort into his defensive assignments without the puck.


Look...it was a rotten year all around from our Core ..our vets who were paid the most ...With CC it was bad luck to get injured and lose him the 2nd half..But with the others. ..simply their own rotten play that doomed bus.

BACK TO KEITH...if he gets back to a 0 in +/- next season from his disastrous -29 this season,then that will be an enormous swing of positive impact for our team..HE should not be running our PP...2 goals ...no way any dman with just that and who fails the eye test on shots from thempiintv (too many blocked...too many unblocked that miss the net)
..no way we should have him running our PP..If Q does that for sure he will lose his job ...


Who the frick is Sean?
 

Panzerspitze

Registered User
Mar 4, 2010
4,958
998
What on earth are you talking about? This team has bad 2 very long offseasons already and if you think one or two weeks will make that much of a difference you are kidding yourself...

May I suggest the purchase of this handy little gadget?
245785_5_.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marotte Marauder

Pez68

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
18,518
25,504
Chicago, IL
In fairness, comparing men's league, even at an elite level, to the grind and pounding of NHL seasons doesn't really match up I don't think. Plus, as (I think?) you have pointed out in other threads, everyone's body is different and starts to break down at different times. Not everyone is Lidstrom or Chelios. Not a ton of 38 year olds playing in the league, let alone at peak form for their careers.

Mileage is different from aging, though. Or injuries.
 

COHawk

Registered User
Sep 16, 2015
2,119
1,020
Keith is 35 years old and has played a ridiculous anount of minutes in the NHL and in international competitions. The mileage on his legs is ridiculous. Whenever I hear that “cyborg” crap or “he isn’t human” nonsense its almost like an excuse to point a finger at him for bad play and using his age cannot possibly be a factor. Its dumb and its not fair to Keith.

Newsflash, Keith is in fact human. He is an older player, has likely played the minutes in his career of someone in his 40’s. If anyone on this team deserves a pass and more understanding for a decline in play it’s Keith, a warrior who has given his absolute all to this organization.
Seriously, he's been a workhorse. Since TOI became a stat in 1998/99, Keith ranks #9 for TOI/game played. Here is the top 30:

PlayerTOIFromToActiveGPTOI/GP
Chris Pronger*22,111199820121380527.467
Brian Leetch*12,98319982006748027.048
Nicklas Lidstrom*27,79019982012131,03326.902
Drew Doughty20,218200820181077026.257
Sergei Zubov18,047199820091068826.231
Erik Karlsson16,27820092018962725.962
Scott Niedermayer*20,504199820101180925.345
Duncan Keith25,092200520181399525.218
Ryan Suter24,862200520181399125.088
Rob Blake*19,943199820101180124.898
Derian Hatcher14,84519982008959724.866
Alex Pietrangelo15,265200820181061724.741
Roman Josi11,83720112018748124.609
Eric Desjardins11,42619982006746524.572
Jay Bouwmeester27,08820022018151,10624.492
P.K. Subban14,24820092018958224.481
Alexei Zhitnik16,04919982008965624.465
Zdeno Chara34,19719982018191,39824.461
Bryan McCabe21,675199820111288924.381
Mattias Ohlund20,194199820111283224.272
Shea Weber20,946200520181386724.159
Dion Phaneuf23,592200520181398124.049
Scott Stevens*10,32519982004643523.736
Sergei Gonchar25,16219982015161,06323.671
Oliver Ekman-Larsson13,62320102018857623.651
Kris Letang16,114200620181268223.628
Joni Pitkanen12,64020032013953523.626
Adam Foote16,970199820111271923.602
Janne Niinimaa13,85219982007858723.598
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

Salvaged Ship

Registered User
Oct 9, 2013
8,625
2,353
Seriously, he's been a workhorse. Since TOI became a stat in 1998/99, Keith ranks #9 for TOI/game played. Here is the top 30:

PlayerTOIFromToActiveGPTOI/GP
Chris Pronger*22,111199820121380527.467
Brian Leetch*12,98319982006748027.048
Nicklas Lidstrom*27,79019982012131,03326.902
Drew Doughty20,218200820181077026.257
Sergei Zubov18,047199820091068826.231
Erik Karlsson16,27820092018962725.962
Scott Niedermayer*20,504199820101180925.345
Duncan Keith25,092200520181399525.218
Ryan Suter24,862200520181399125.088
Rob Blake*19,943199820101180124.898
Derian Hatcher14,84519982008959724.866
Alex Pietrangelo15,265200820181061724.741
Roman Josi11,83720112018748124.609
Eric Desjardins11,42619982006746524.572
Jay Bouwmeester27,08820022018151,10624.492
P.K. Subban14,24820092018958224.481
Alexei Zhitnik16,04919982008965624.465
Zdeno Chara34,19719982018191,39824.461
Bryan McCabe21,675199820111288924.381
Mattias Ohlund20,194199820111283224.272
Shea Weber20,946200520181386724.159
Dion Phaneuf23,592200520181398124.049
Scott Stevens*10,32519982004643523.736
Sergei Gonchar25,16219982015161,06323.671
Oliver Ekman-Larsson13,62320102018857623.651
Kris Letang16,114200620181268223.628
Joni Pitkanen12,64020032013953523.626
Adam Foote16,970199820111271923.602
Janne Niinimaa13,85219982007858723.598
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Well I was told by someone the amount you play over a career has no bearing on someones play declining, so in spite of completely disagreeing I decided to shut up. And on top of that we know he has had knee issues and with the silent injury policy of the NHL we have no idea what shape that knee is in or how all of those “miles” has affected it.

My original post stands, the amount of play along with age has combined in his decline and probably worn his bad knee down. Guy is a warrior, I have no issues and complete understanding on why he is not the player he once was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: COHawk

COHawk

Registered User
Sep 16, 2015
2,119
1,020
Well I was told by someone the amount you play over a career has no bearing on someones play declining, so in spite of completely disagreeing I decided to shut up. And on top of that we know he has had knee issues and with the silent injury policy of the NHL we have no idea what shape that knee is in or how all of those “miles” has affected it.

My original post stands, the amount of play along with age has combined in his decline and probably worn his bad knee down. Guy is a warrior, I have no issues and complete understanding on why he is not the player he once was.
I agree with you. Not everyone can be a physical specimen like Nik Lidstrom and play incredibly well into their 40s. I mean shit, Bobby Orr was retired and in the HHOF well before Keith's current age. Makes you think about what our expectations really should be for level of play as a player ages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvaged Ship

hawksfan50

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
14,098
1,981
OK sorry about the typos in Mt last post. ..I corrected them ...somehow Seabs turned into Dean and Toews turned into Toes..but my errors in typing on a small keyboard on my smartphone are not important. .what is are the points I was making ...and on Keith especially ,and no "goid" season for him would be to eradicate the -29 to at the very least Even...the days of him getting back to +25 all star for and 30 minutes a night are long long gone.. He should not be on oulousy PP. .he is a big part of its problems ...I do not think he is an effective pk guy either aymore...He just seemed to have lost his compete "hunger" and was playing like a cheque-casher punching a clock ..his mind in a fog many shifts..weak stick-vhecls ...good or beat a lot more than in his good for years..Can he rebound. .from -29 ?Yes ..but probably not to any form of "dominating" ice presence again..Looking off 29 goals against would be a great achievement because I do not expect very much offer sive production improvement from him at this stage of his career.So it would be great if he just focused on preventing a lot more goals..by better mire focused checking...staying with checks longer.. winning more puck battles..being hungrier not to give an inch and blocking paths you our net...and a clearer more aware mind to realize where the puck is and clear it away from our crease ..Whatever substances he was taking that dulled his mind or water psychological problems he was going g through...they must be jettisoned to get him back to 100% Focus on hockey and his own level of play..I believe his offensivecskilks have diminished ..but if Q dies not mis-use andbover'use him I believe he can rebound to be more effective preventing goals and that SHOULD get him back to about evens in the +/- game at even strength ..That does not make him a #1 anymore ..but we cannot win if he is a -29 ..Get back to even...That would be a great I mprovement for us.And ifhe can no longer do even that ,then it is indeed over for him and he joins the list of albatross contracts we now have accumulated and we shall have to consider the old LTIR remedy for his aging disease ...

We are promised a re-juvebation in that Keith and Seabs say they will dedicate this summer to report back in the best shape they can be for next season..but we heard this from Toews about his new training methods last summer..and that turned out badly ..So I hope Keith and Seabs do not expect their promise to improve training will get them back to "stardom"...how about just to "competence" again?I would take that ..it will not win us a Cup but it could get us back to playoffs and some respect instead of being the new laughingstock of the league..
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad