The bottom line is that some people see the situation one way, supported by the staff and the player himself. Some see it a different way and prefer to try and read between the lines.
The one play he made at the point was hilarious. He waited... waited... and sent a crisp, hard pass to an open Shark player in the middle of the ice with no Pens player within 10 feet. Tape to tape. Sick pass.
So I suppose we beat a good Western Conference team handily, therefore everything is fine now right? All good. I just want to point out that Edmonton also destroyed a good Western Conference team last night. So I believe small sample size is in order, here.
I'm just happy Maatta and Despres look good. Who cares which one is better?
Despres definitely has the best outlet pass from the back end right now, and yep I'm including Letang. Despres just has unreal vision and long bomb accuracy.
is this actually a sentiment that was expressed by a significant portion of the posting population? i haven't read the whole thread, so pardon my earnestness.
I love them both and have said both would be untouchable in my mind. I just find there's a certain segment of this board dead-set on marginalizing Despres, led by your BFF. It's ridiculous.
I love them both and have said both would be untouchable in my mind. I just find there's a certain segment of this board dead-set on marginalizing Despres, led by your BFF. It's ridiculous.
If I'm thinking of the same play, it looked like he partially fanned on it to me.
I think finding a spot where Jokinen looks "right" on more than one or two shifts a night should be a priority. I think finding out if Megna is a long-term answer in the top-6 should be a priority.
These injuries are bad, but they should be viewed as a blessing. You have the chance to see what you have.
The KEY KEY KEY KEY KEY KEY is not ignoring what you're seeing right now.
I also cannot (for the life of me) remember to include his first "s" in his name. It just doesn't belong there.
If I'm thinking of the same play, it looked like he partially fanned on it to me.
I think the third line needs more Uher.
I love them both and have said both would be untouchable in my mind. I just find there's a certain segment of this board dead-set on marginalizing Despres, led by your BFF. It's ridiculous.
The third line needs a lot of things...starting with needing less of what we currently have on it.
I had to DVR it and re-watched the play... He just looked like he didn't know the guy was a Shark, because he snapped the puck right to him. It was funny, in a bad way
I'm not sure if Megna can be a top six answer now, but he has earned a roster spot. He plays fast. He plays hard. He plays gritty. And most of all he is productive with the minutes he gets. He always finds ways to generate scoring chances. Oh and he's productive.
Not sure what else he needs to do.
I think the third line needs more Uher.
I'm certainly not suggesting Megna is the answer to it problems, but like you said, so far he's earned it. You never like injuries, but injuries have shown us Megna, the shown us a better 4th line, and they shown us what Maatta and Despres can do. That's what I meant by not ignoring what you see.
Who cares where Megna was (or wasn't) drafted. Who cares how much Jokinen makes. Who cares about Tanner Glass' and Craig Adams' feelings?
You have these guys (Megna, Despres, Maatta, Sill) in your system. They've proven that they are better than the guys they are replacing. Act on it.
That's where I'm at. If we don't plan on re-signing him, get a longterm top 9 winger back and move on.
Maatta-Letang
Scuds-Martin
Despres-Nisky
Engo-Bort
I think we're good.
That's a good group. Lacks some bite for the playoffs but it's definitely enough to win games.
The Sharks had almost 50 shots, they showed up offensively but not defensively.
Despres has moved into the untouchable list IMO too. I also cannot (for the life of me) remember to include his first "s" in his name. It just doesn't belong there.