I pretty much agree most of the guys in the top 10 would be there, but I think 11 to 20 it would look MUCH different.Belizarius said:It was hard to make a mistake in this 1st round... 29 of 30 players are already playing pro.
And a lot of them played at least 1 NHL game already...
Remaining players still in AHL/ECHL/NCAA without 1 NHL game :
Jessiman
Pouliot
Stuart
Boyle
Belle
so it means 25/30 players drafted in the 1st round played in the NHL at 20. Not so bad... Hard to argue on the top-10, the lone player on the bubble would be Kostitsyn because of the play of Carter, Richards, Brown or Seabrook for example. But still a good pick it seems...
Nearly all the 2nd round is playing in the AHL or NHL already so again, hard to say there's a bad pick, and even hard to redone a top-10. Every team had specifics needs at this time (G, D or F) and every team seems to be happy of their choices.
I would say some guys like Bergeron or Fritsche deserved to be in the 1st round but it's tough to crack the top-30 when you see who is there...
Not my intention, was just discussing the 03 draft with someone and all the talent, like Bergeron being a 3rd round pick. he'd easily be top 20 now, Perry and Richards would probably move into the top 20.Legionnaire said:Good post. Weird actually, since I was just coming to say pretty much the same thing.
There would be some risers. And yes, Perry would be one of them if that was your intention in starting this thread . But 03 is such a talented draft class that it's quite hard to pin down who should go where today. I mean, as was pointed out there are a lot of guys already in the NHL, but that doesn't really negate the potential of those who aren't, and nor does it mean that other players won't progress.
RallyKiller said:Not my intention, was just discussing the 03 draft with someone and all the talent, like Bergeron being a 3rd round pick. he'd easily be top 20 now, Perry and Richards would probably move into the top 20.
RallyKiller said:Not my intention, was just discussing the 03 draft with someone and all the talent, like Bergeron being a 3rd round pick. he'd easily be top 20 now
neelynugs said:the first round of this draft was unreal. which team do you think regrets their choice the most?
Brodeur said:Not picking on the Rangers, but Jessiman's not looking too good at the moment. Atlanta probably would rather have Phaneuf over Coburn, but it's still very early for all of these prospects.
neelynugs said:yup - jessiman looks like a pig next to the rest of those guys, but in fairness to him, he was considered a project from the get-go.
scoutman1 said:here is how my top 30 would look:
1. Nikolai Zherdev
2. Eric Staal
3. M-A Fleury
4. Dion Phaneuf
5. Patrice Bergeron
6. Jeff Carter
7. Nathan Horton
8. Thomas Vanek
9. Mike Richards
10. Milan Michalek
11. Ryan Gatzlaf
12. Dustin Brown
13. Ryan Suter
14. Dan Fritisch
15. Patrick O'Sullivan
16. Shea Weber
17. Corey Perry
18. Steve Bernier
19. J-F Jaques
20. Brent Seabrook
21. Zach Parise
22. Braydon Coburn
23. Brent Burns
24. Ryan Kesler
25. Corey Crawford
26. Mark Stuart
27. Robert Nilsson
28. Anthony Stewart
29. Eric Fehr
30. Patrick Eaves
Bobby Ryan Getzlaf said:My top 10:
1.Eric Staal
2.Dion Phaneuf
3.Nikolai Zherdev
4.Marc-Andre Fleury
5.Nathan Horton
6.Ryan Suter
7.Jeff Carter
8.Tomas Vanek
9.Ryan Getzlaf
10.Dustin Brown
Skroob said:and he still is. He's a young powerforward, and missed a year due to injury.
I dont seem to remember Bertuzzi or LeClair tearing it up early on. These guys took 5-6 years after they were drafted to begin to become productive.
Caniacforever said:How in the world can people still have Zherdev over Staal at this point? Staal has been a force at both ends of the ice. He has 44 points in 32 games with 22 goals, and Zherdev has 15 points in the same 32 games, is a defensive liability, and was healthy scratched earlier in the season.
He's looking like Stanislav Chistov did the last time hockey was played, after a great debut he fizzled out.
I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion, but wow that's pretty funny.
Kaizer said:Well, don't want to do full first round but my Top-10 would be :
1. Staal
2. Fleury
3. Phaneuf
4. Zherdev
5. Horton
6. Vanek
7. Suter
8. Seabrook
9. Bergeron
10.Richards
Slitty said:There is a differance between production and skill + potential. Believe it or not, these kids aren't molded into what player they will be yet. Some find that Zherdev, maybe not on current play or production, would be a greater asset to a franchise than Staal. Remember, we are drafting players and not making a list of who is playing better.
As for Chistov, after getting off to a very slow start, he has picked up his game and is currently outproducing his young compatiots Semin and Svitov combined by a fair margin. He isnt anywhere close to the top of the scoring race, but hanging in there.