if the 2003 draft could be done all over again...

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Randall Graves*, Dec 19, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. What would the first round draft order be?
     
  2. Kaizer

    Kaizer Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    4,321
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Moscow , Russia
    Well, don't want to do full first round but my Top-10 would be :
    1. Staal
    2. Fleury
    3. Phaneuf
    4. Zherdev
    5. Horton
    6. Vanek
    7. Suter
    8. Seabrook
    9. Bergeron
    10.Richards
     
  3. J17 Vs Proclamation

    J17 Vs Proclamation Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,025
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    College baby!
    Location:
    Reading.
    I dont think any of the top teams would draft a different guy but :

    #1 Staal
    #2 Horton
    3# Phaneuf
    4# Fleury
    5# Zherdev
    6# Vanek
    7# Seabrook
    8# Carter
    9# Michalek
    10# Suter
     
  4. Belizarius

    Belizarius Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Occupation:
    Working in a library
    Location:
    Southern France
    Home Page:
    It was hard to make a mistake in this 1st round... 29 of 30 players are already playing pro.
    And a lot of them played at least 1 NHL game already...
    Remaining players still in AHL/ECHL/NCAA without 1 NHL game :
    Jessiman
    Pouliot
    Stuart
    Boyle
    Belle

    so it means 25/30 players drafted in the 1st round played in the NHL at 20. Not so bad... Hard to argue on the top-10, the lone player on the bubble would be Kostitsyn because of the play of Carter, Richards, Brown or Seabrook for example. But still a good pick it seems...
    Nearly all the 2nd round is playing in the AHL or NHL already so again, hard to say there's a bad pick, and even hard to redone a top-10. Every team had specifics needs at this time (G, D or F) and every team seems to be happy of their choices.
    I would say some guys like Bergeron or Fritsche deserved to be in the 1st round but it's tough to crack the top-30 when you see who is there...
     
  5. Legionnaire

    Legionnaire Kill! Jeff, Kill!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2002
    Messages:
    40,755
    Likes Received:
    913
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    LA-LA Land
    Home Page:
    Good post. Weird actually, since I was just coming to say pretty much the same thing.

    There would be some risers. And yes, Perry would be one of them if that was your intention in starting this thread ;). But 03 is such a talented draft class that it's quite hard to pin down who should go where today. I mean, as was pointed out there are a lot of guys already in the NHL, but that doesn't really negate the potential of those who aren't, and nor does it mean that other players won't progress.
     
  6. Eric Fehr will be a force in this leauge, mark my words.
     
  7. I pretty much agree most of the guys in the top 10 would be there, but I think 11 to 20 it would look MUCH different.
     
  8. Not my intention, was just discussing the 03 draft with someone and all the talent, like Bergeron being a 3rd round pick. he'd easily be top 20 now, Perry and Richards would probably move into the top 20.
     
  9. neelynugs

    neelynugs Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    31,384
    Likes Received:
    534
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Vote Quimby! (and California)
    bergeron was a 2nd rounder - 45th overall.

    the first round of this draft was unreal. which team do you think regrets their choice the most?
     
  10. Brodeur

    Brodeur Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    504
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    San Diego
    Bergeron was a 2nd rounder (45th overall). Just imagine if Alexander Ovechkin had just been two days older and had been eligible for this draft as well!
     
  11. Brodeur

    Brodeur Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    504
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    San Diego
    Not picking on the Rangers, but Jessiman's not looking too good at the moment. Atlanta probably would rather have Phaneuf over Coburn now [albeit most places had Coburn rated higher in 2003], but it's still very early for all of these prospects.
     
  12. scoutman1

    scoutman1 Twitter - scoutman33

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,849
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Home Page:
    here is how my top 30 would look:

    1. Nikolai Zherdev
    2. Eric Staal
    3. M-A Fleury
    4. Dion Phaneuf
    5. Patrice Bergeron
    6. Jeff Carter
    7. Nathan Horton
    8. Thomas Vanek
    9. Mike Richards
    10. Milan Michalek
    11. Ryan Gatzlaf
    12. Dustin Brown
    13. Ryan Suter
    14. Dan Fritisch
    15. Patrick O'Sullivan
    16. Shea Weber
    17. Corey Perry
    18. Steve Bernier
    19. J-F Jaques
    20. Brent Seabrook
    21. Zach Parise
    22. Braydon Coburn
    23. Brent Burns
    24. Ryan Kesler
    25. Corey Crawford
    26. Mark Stuart
    27. Robert Nilsson
    28. Anthony Stewart
    29. Eric Fehr
    30. Patrick Eaves
     
  13. neelynugs

    neelynugs Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    31,384
    Likes Received:
    534
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Vote Quimby! (and California)
    yup - jessiman looks like a pig next to the rest of those guys, but in fairness to him, he was considered a project from the get-go.
     
  14. Skroob*

    Skroob* Guest

    and he still is. He's a young powerforward, and missed a year due to injury.

    I dont seem to remember Bertuzzi or LeClair tearing it up early on. These guys took 5-6 years after they were drafted to begin to become productive.
     
  15. Colt.45Orr

    Colt.45Orr Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    12,938
    Likes Received:
    365
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    Canada
    Home Page:
    My list would look somewhat close to yours.. Seabrook being the major jump on my list... and I am not that sold on Brenier either. I would (personally) have Getzlaf right around there too.
     
  16. Hedberg

    Hedberg MLD Glue Guy

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    16,397
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Location:
    BC, Canada
    My top 10:
    1. Eric Staal
    2. Dion Phaneuff
    3. Marc-Andre Fleury
    4. Patrice Bergeron
    5. Nikolai Zherdev
    6. Nathan Horton
    7. Thomas Vanek
    8. Jeff Carter
    9. Dustin Brown
    10. Brent Seabrook
     
  17. The Mighty Duck Man

    The Mighty Duck Man R-E-L-A-X

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    25,957
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Saskatoon
    Home Page:
    My top 10:

    1.Eric Staal
    2.Dion Phaneuf
    3.Nikolai Zherdev
    4.Marc-Andre Fleury
    5.Nathan Horton
    6.Ryan Suter
    7.Jeff Carter
    8.Tomas Vanek
    9.Ryan Getzlaf
    10.Dustin Brown
     
  18. Dave is a killer

    Dave is a killer Dave's a Mess

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Mount Juliet
    Home Page:
    you're the only one that has Suter moving up a spot ... *places BRG on buddy list*
     
  19. Vagrant

    Vagrant The Czech Condor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,196
    Likes Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Home Page:
    How in the world can people still have Zherdev over Staal at this point? Staal has been a force at both ends of the ice. He has 44 points in 32 games with 22 goals, and Zherdev has 15 points in the same 32 games, is a defensive liability, and was healthy scratched earlier in the season.

    He's looking like Stanislav Chistov did the last time hockey was played, after a great debut he fizzled out.

    I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion, but wow that's pretty funny.
     
  20. Kafka

    Kafka Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    5,355
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Montreal
    Home Page:
    Why?
     
  21. Vagrant

    Vagrant The Czech Condor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,196
    Likes Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Home Page:
    The only differance is that Bertuzzi and LeClair only had trouble putting it together at the NHL level, Jessiman has struggled to make an AHL club and is now playing hockey in the ECHL. Granted, he's doing some good things in the ECHL, but it's not nearly the level of hockey of the AHL.

    Bertuzzi went straight to the NHL from Guelph and registered about 40 points in his debut pro season. He wasn't in the AHL, he wasn't in the ECHL, he was in the NHL. Aside from a 13 game stretch in 96-97, Bertuzzi has never played pro hockey below the NHL level. Not once. The parallel between Bertuzzi and Jessiman is invalid for that reason. NYR isn't so deep at forward that, before the season, they couldn't have risked giving him a look at the NHL level had his play waranted it.

    John Leclair has the same story. Only 10 games of any experience outside the NHL level. Care to see what he did?

    1991-92 Fredericton Canadiens AHL 8 7 7 14

    That was the AHL, not the ECHL as well. I know at the time there was a more diverse system of minor league hockey, but the fact he only played 8 games outside the NHL in his pro career speaks volumes about his immense potential. Potential that, to this point, Jessiman has not shown.

    Both of these guys didn't climb out of the woodwork and start scoring at a tremendous clip in the NHL. Both were decent enough gambles to at least hold a spot on an NHL roster.

    EDIT: what is also failed to mention is that Jessiman, before his injury, could only register 2 points in 12 games with Dartmouth, of all places. At that point in his development, he should have had at least 20 points in that amount of time. Hell, he scored 47 points in 34 games as a freshman in his draft year for crying out loud. He should have at the very least bettered those numbers with a maturing body and hockey sense.
     
  22. Slitty

    Slitty Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,862
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96

    There is a differance between production and skill + potential. Believe it or not, these kids aren't molded into what player they will be yet. Some find that Zherdev, maybe not on current play or production, would be a greater asset to a franchise than Staal. Remember, we are drafting players and not making a list of who is playing better.

    As for Chistov, after getting off to a very slow start, he has picked up his game and is currently outproducing his young compatiots Semin and Svitov combined by a fair margin. He isnt anywhere close to the top of the scoring race, but hanging in there.
     
  23. Slabber Chops

    Slabber Chops Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    New Zealand
    As it was always advertised, it was a brilliant draft. You can really argue for any of those top 5 players being 1st overall and any of those players being 5th overall in this draft. It was just one of those drafts where you legitimately drafted upon organisational need and came out happy.
     
  24. San Jose(both picks, could've had Phanuef)
    Montreal
    Vancouver(Kesler is a nice player but passed on Richards amongst others)

    with that said, it's only been a few years since that draft, Michalek and Kostsitsyn still have plenty of potential though.
     
  25. Vagrant

    Vagrant The Czech Condor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,196
    Likes Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Home Page:
    I still fail to see the validity of that argument. Staal, as of right now, is performing as one of the top players in the league on both offense and defense. Zherdev is performing under expectations for a player of his age as well as judging him by past precident.

    What you’re saying is that Zherdev has the potential to be one of the top scorers in the league, which Staal is already performing as, and is now more valuable than Staal based on this assumption? Would you say that Zherdev has 50 goal potential? Well Staal is on pace with 22 goals in 32 team games. Would you say that Zherdev has the potential to be a decent defensive player? Staal is already well above average. Are you saying that Zherdev has the potential to lead a team almost single handedly to a playoff birth, well have you seen the standings in the east lately?

    I’m not singling out your points to try to disrespect your opinion, I’m just challenging the idea that the unknown is always better than the known quantity on these boards. I know it’s hockey’s future and all, but the present has to be taken into account as well when you’re evaluating talent and evaluation a draft.

    It sounds to me as if you're saying that there are GM's in this league that would skip Staal, who is already looking like an elite talent, to take a potential elite talent.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"