Heaton
Moderator
What does that say to you about:
- Jeff Blashill
- Jakub Kindl
- XO and Marchenko
I think it says more about XO and Marchenko. At some point, you have to convert that potential ability into actual ability and make an NHL team. You only get to be a prospect for so long, and those two are starting to push it.
It strongly suggests that:
(a) Ken Holland truly and sincerely believes that a team needs 8 or 9 NHL defensemen over the course of a season.
(b) We can't give Kindl away.
Kindl isn't nearly as bad as people on this board perceive him to be.
Kindl isn't nearly as bad as people on this board perceive him to be.
This is exactly why I'm worried about our future defensemen. By not producing anyone better than Ericsson since Kronwall in 2000, we're getting to a point where our defense is going to get much worse before it gets better.
I think we'll still need 8 or 9 defensemen, but Kindl having an opening night roster spot? That's scary.
No, but he's not that good either. He's not great offensively, not good defensively. He's a #7 at best.
This answer is bigger than the question, because I believe the question is actually bigger.
I think the real question here is more along the lines of what will happen with Blash as the coach (and, I know there is a thread on that already), i.e. is the Blash era a continuation of the Babcock era, or is it a new beginning.
If Blash is Babs 2.0, it will say that Kindl fits the Babs style of play better (which is a bit hard to believe by the evidence we have) or that someone (Blash, maybe Holland) thinks he does.
My hope is that the Blash era is a new beginning, with a clean slate for everyone, including Kindl, Howard, etc. If that is true, it means that Kindl fits Blash's vision better than XO and Marchy. Also a bit hard to believe by the evidence we have, but could happen.
Unless Blash ushers in a new era and senior manangement is on board with that, Blash will end up being Dave Lewis 2.0... with the same ultimate result.
He may not be great, but one could argue hes our best offensive D man we have not named Kronwall. (Not including Zids of course)
This is terrifying to me. If Holland sits on his hands and we trot out the same roster we had last year because everyone gets a 'clean slate', we're in real danger of never improving.
He has 62 points in 248 games while playing in a mostly offensive role when given opportunities. He's not that good offensively, you can say he is good because we have literally no one else good offensively besides Kronwall on defense.
I'm more scared of....
If Kindl doesn't beat them out, but Holland sends XO and Marchenko down anyways.
I honestly believe, we'll see a better Jakub Kindl under different coach, who won't push so much mentally as Babcock did.
But still, won't see Kindl as long-term Red Wings plans, more of getting his trade value back, which is zero atm.
If Smith is not traded and re-signed, I think XO will stay down until we move a body and Marchenko starts up.
Kronner - E
DeKeyser - Q
Smith - M
Kindl - (XO)
Do you consider that defense an improvement over last year? I think unless we see some drastic differences with how we approach it we're destined for more issues.
Do you consider that defense an improvement over last year? I think unless we see some drastic differences with how we approach it we're destined for more issues.
Kindl to probably be our 7th dman. I don't think Kindl is dealable unless we take on a bad contract back.