Roomba With a Bauer
Registered User
- Sep 11, 2007
- 4,399
- 2,998
So, ever since Datsyuk announced he was leaving, a question has been on my mind. Ken Holland acts like he had no idea Datsyuk was leaving, but I think that is BS.
The question is, assuming Datsyuk told KH he was leaving, should Holland have traded Datsyuk at the deadline to a. Give him a chance at the cup, b. Get rid of his cap hit, and c. get an asset before Datsyuk leaves us with a gaping hole in our roster.
It was pretty clear even at the deadline that this team was a bubble team with little serious chance at the cup.
I think the answer is pretty clearly yes. We could have probably gotten a late first for Dats, and while we would have certainly missed the playoffs we would have gotten a top 10 pick with an outside shot at the top three. We could have also traded soon-to-be UFA Helm for a low second and gone into the draft with four picks in the first two rounds. You could probably also unload Howard at the draft with money retained for another second.
While capitulating on this year's playoffs would sting, two first round picks with our developing young core would make this team far more attractive to UFAs. I think we would be a far stronger team next year, especially if we use the freed up money and assets to get a few legit top-six UFAs (Stamkos) or a legit top-pair D (Shattenkirk, Handle). With our young players and the chance of reloading, we would be potential cup contenders within a few years, instead of being out 7.5 mil and a top-six C next season.
Thoughts?
The question is, assuming Datsyuk told KH he was leaving, should Holland have traded Datsyuk at the deadline to a. Give him a chance at the cup, b. Get rid of his cap hit, and c. get an asset before Datsyuk leaves us with a gaping hole in our roster.
It was pretty clear even at the deadline that this team was a bubble team with little serious chance at the cup.
I think the answer is pretty clearly yes. We could have probably gotten a late first for Dats, and while we would have certainly missed the playoffs we would have gotten a top 10 pick with an outside shot at the top three. We could have also traded soon-to-be UFA Helm for a low second and gone into the draft with four picks in the first two rounds. You could probably also unload Howard at the draft with money retained for another second.
While capitulating on this year's playoffs would sting, two first round picks with our developing young core would make this team far more attractive to UFAs. I think we would be a far stronger team next year, especially if we use the freed up money and assets to get a few legit top-six UFAs (Stamkos) or a legit top-pair D (Shattenkirk, Handle). With our young players and the chance of reloading, we would be potential cup contenders within a few years, instead of being out 7.5 mil and a top-six C next season.
Thoughts?